There is a wee blue icon on the screen with Tapatalk. I've attached a pic for youMacca wrote:Why can’t I see the poll, is it the website I need to use and not crapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Edit: Guy beat me to it.
There is a wee blue icon on the screen with Tapatalk. I've attached a pic for youMacca wrote:Why can’t I see the poll, is it the website I need to use and not crapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Here is a picture how Hager did the number split at 3 (6 on the bezel) and 9 (18 on the bezel) on a black and white beze. They used black and white lume. I do know they shipped some of them with accidently with all white numbers and it didn't look good, image attached from Hodinkee.Kip wrote:The answer to the 2 tone bezel number lume question is yes. If black numbers are used they can be lumed. Not certain how that would be done at 3 and 9 though.
The reality is that the black, although it will glow, is not very good to begin with and would severely pale next to the white.
MarkingTime wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2019 9:58 pm Solid grey bezel with white numbers would solve the issue.
Actually, white numbers would work on a two tone grey as well, so long as the lighter grey were not too light.Mikkei4 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2019 10:01 pmMarkingTime wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2019 9:58 pm Solid grey bezel with white numbers would solve the issue.
I agree, to a point, but once the options are whittled down, those votes might switch to other preferences and actually increase some of the total numbers for the remaining options.TigerChris wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2019 12:06 am Being honest, those numbers don't look too good to me for getting this off the ground. Looking at the splits I just can't see how we are going to get to a design that a minimum of 25 people will be happy to pay a premium for. Only my opinion, obviously, but it's not looking favourable so far. I hope I'm wrong as I'd like to see another FLE but, looking at the numbers I think I'll be bowing out already as my preferences just won't have enough backing.
It sounds like you are of the same sort of mindset as me about the case. I’m 100% behind the blue PVD also, but don’t see the regular C60 as ‘sufficiently distinctive’ enough (I’ve quoted that as I like how you’ve put that ). Yes, life is full of compromises, but how many people can afford to make too many compromises when spending the best part of a grand. There lies the issue in my opinion. I’m still trying to keep an open mind though as, whether it will be a design I like or not, I’d love to see it get off the ground. My personal issue also is that I currently have a clear vision as to where I want my collection to go and so can’t afford to go spending money on compromises.Galton321 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2019 11:01 am Life is full of compromises. My decision is, however, simple. I don't like the GMT design offered so they are out no matter what other variations are offered. So down to the C60 design. Of these I like the blue PVD, I.have never seen this done before. Blue translucent dial, possible. The other C60s not sufficiently distinctive from standard C60. So it looks like I will be disappointed. Although I tried to produce a decision tree using the survey data to find a definite front runner. But I'll give it another go.