Here you can post stuff that is not related to Christopher Ward
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 3:59 pm

Re: Two-handers?

Post by JAFO »

Not having seconds removes the anal requirement to know how accurately a watch is running,:which can be more relaxing. Let's face it, if it's +/- 5 secs a day, after a fortnight it's only about a minute off, and then it's a minor adjustment to correct. Once you get a seconds hand you find yourself needing to synchronise the second hand to your mobile, or, far more frequently than is really necessary (unless you just decide you can live with it being about right)

User avatar
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 1832
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:44 pm
CW-watches: 1
Location: Hua Hin, Thailand

Re: Two-handers?

Post by Caller »

I have one two hander amongst my 20+ plus watches and I enjoy the novelty of the change. To be honest, I am so used to it now, that I never give it a thought. At first I would check the time keeping all the time. Now, as I know it works just fine, I am quite relaxed about it.
'Tis me

User avatar
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 3:51 pm

Re: Two-handers?

Post by Fat-Sam »

I was gifted a Raymond Weil Toccata which is quartz and only has 2 hands- for me it suits me as the ticking quartz hand would likely annoy me and it’s a dress watch so the simpler the better.

I owned a Pam114 years ago and found it boring after a month or so - not sure if that’s all Panerai watches but it’s been my last. I think at a certain price I expect to be at least a little bit “entertained” 😂
I never had the makings of a varsity athlete...
CW Dartmouth (blue)
Omega Seamaster Deville 1961 (Gold)
Omega Speedmaster 2018 (Mitsukoshi dial)
DIY Watch Club Diver (black)
Raymond Weil Toccata (white/copper)
G shock GW-M5610 (black out)

Post Reply