That's a shame, I'm sure forum members would have been interested to hear how Hello thought the rebranding had gone.Kip wrote:Just Mike and Chris.Tyke wrote:I think it is commendable that they have decided to agree to this in light of the recent postings on here - I note that from CW it will be Mike & Chris in attendance, will the Hello people be joining in?
Chat with Chris 2016
Re: Chat with Chris 2016
- Bahnstormer_vRS
- Moderator
- Posts: 35166
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:06 pm
- CW-watches: 34
- LE-three: 1
- LE-foura: 1
- LE-fourb: 1
- LE-six: 1
- Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Re: Chat with Chris 2016
Its 'Chat with Chris' not with Uncle Tom Cobbly and all.Tyke wrote:That's a shame, I'm sure forum members would have been interested to hear how Hello thought the rebranding had gone.Kip wrote:Just Mike and Chris.Tyke wrote:I think it is commendable that they have decided to agree to this in light of the recent postings on here - I note that from CW it will be Mike & Chris in attendance, will the Hello people be joining in?
Guy
Sent from my Xperia Z5 Premium
In small proportions, we just beautie see:
And in short measures, life may perfect bee. - Ben Jonson (1572 – 1637)
Inscription on the Longitude Dial
Hatfield House, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 5NB, England
And in short measures, life may perfect bee. - Ben Jonson (1572 – 1637)
Inscription on the Longitude Dial
Hatfield House, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 5NB, England
Re: Chat with Chris 2016
Agree.Bahnstormer_vRS wrote:Its 'Chat with Chris' not with Uncle Tom Cobbly and all.Tyke wrote:That's a shame, I'm sure forum members would have been interested to hear how Hello thought the rebranding had gone.Kip wrote: Just Mike and Chris.
Guy
Sent from my Xperia Z5 Premium
The only two people who really matter are Mike and Chris going forwards.
The re-brand is done and dusted. It is what it is, and we need to move forwards. This will be the first step in that.
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
Re: Chat with Chris 2016
Yup, far too dangerous to risk letting Mr edgy and disruptive anywhere near the conversationBahnstormer_vRS wrote: Its 'Chat with Chris' not with Uncle Tom Cobbly and all.
Guy
Sent from my Xperia Z5 Premium
- paw3001
- Trusted Seller
- Posts: 2798
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:50 pm
- CW-watches: 4
- LE-two: yes
- Location: Berlin - Brexit Refugee!
Chat with Chris 2016
I don't agree that we need Hello. They were the agency chosen by the CW team and not the decision makers. Therefore it makes little sense to have them join the chat.
At the end of the day they are a third party agency who no doubt worked on a number of different design options. They did not decide on the design taken forward!
At the end of the day they are a third party agency who no doubt worked on a number of different design options. They did not decide on the design taken forward!
Watches - Too many but not enough!
- Bahnstormer_vRS
- Moderator
- Posts: 35166
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:06 pm
- CW-watches: 34
- LE-three: 1
- LE-foura: 1
- LE-fourb: 1
- LE-six: 1
- Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Re: Chat with Chris 2016
Give it a rest and 'put a sock in it'.Tyke wrote:Yup, far too dangerous to risk letting Mr edgy and disruptive anywhere near the conversationBahnstormer_vRS wrote: Its 'Chat with Chris' not with Uncle Tom Cobbly and all.
Guy
Sent from my Xperia Z5 Premium
Guy
Sent from my Xperia Z5 Premium
In small proportions, we just beautie see:
And in short measures, life may perfect bee. - Ben Jonson (1572 – 1637)
Inscription on the Longitude Dial
Hatfield House, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 5NB, England
And in short measures, life may perfect bee. - Ben Jonson (1572 – 1637)
Inscription on the Longitude Dial
Hatfield House, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 5NB, England
Re: Chat with Chris 2016
Bahnstormer_vRS wrote:Give it a rest and 'put a sock in it'.Tyke wrote:Yup, far too dangerous to risk letting Mr edgy and disruptive anywhere near the conversationBahnstormer_vRS wrote: Its 'Chat with Chris' not with Uncle Tom Cobbly and all.
Guy
Sent from my Xperia Z5 Premium
Guy
Sent from my Xperia Z5 Premium
Re: Chat with Chris 2016
Shame Hello and Uncle Tom are not going to join as they will prob know more then Chris will. Recently he's just a name in dodgy font positioned stupidly on a watch face
Current collection = Omega Seamaster 2225.80.00, Omega Speedmaster 'Moonphase' 3576.50.00, Breitling Aerospace Evo, Vintage Azur, Vintage Seiko Sprtsman, Grand Seiko SBGX059, Omega SMP NTTD 210.92.42.20.01.001, Casioak Milkyway, Casioak Tiffany Sky.
Re: Chat with Chris 2016
Can we please both accept and be grateful that it will be Mike and Chris and leave it at that.
To me it says volumes that despite all the spite and vitriol levelled at them over the past few weeks (I am also guilty of that), - they still have the decency and cojones to speak directly to us.
If however we turn this thread into a playground p155ing contest, the chances are that they will turn round and tell us to sod off.
I for one welcome the fact that two of the major shareholders are prepared to give their time and effort in getting involved.
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
To me it says volumes that despite all the spite and vitriol levelled at them over the past few weeks (I am also guilty of that), - they still have the decency and cojones to speak directly to us.
If however we turn this thread into a playground p155ing contest, the chances are that they will turn round and tell us to sod off.
I for one welcome the fact that two of the major shareholders are prepared to give their time and effort in getting involved.
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
-
- Forumgod
- Posts: 872
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:45 am
- CW-watches: 14
- LE-one: yes
- LE-two: yes
- Location: Hampshire
Re: Chat with Chris 2016
I hope we are not going to treat the chat as some sort of parliamentary enquiry. What has happened happened. Can we move on and find out what the company are planning and respond to their answers?
Re: Chat with Chris 2016
I agree with smeggers. I just think some people need winding up
Current collection = Omega Seamaster 2225.80.00, Omega Speedmaster 'Moonphase' 3576.50.00, Breitling Aerospace Evo, Vintage Azur, Vintage Seiko Sprtsman, Grand Seiko SBGX059, Omega SMP NTTD 210.92.42.20.01.001, Casioak Milkyway, Casioak Tiffany Sky.
Re: Chat with Chris 2016
If you all look back at the OP from kip, this IS a chat specifically 'regarding the recent rebranding and website upgrade' not about anything else, so it 's not a brush it under the carpet chat, more of a clear the air discussion so we can move on to the secondary aspect of discussing future watches. Apologies to all who just want the problems to magically go away, but unless you address them they will continue to fester like an open wound.
Discuss the problems, learn the lessons, THEN move on.
Discuss the problems, learn the lessons, THEN move on.
Re: Chat with Chris 2016
You are chatting with the guys who signed off on the changes! What more do you want?Tyke wrote:If you all look back at the OP from kip, this IS a chat specifically 'regarding the recent rebranding and website upgrade' not about anything else, so it 's not a brush it under the carpet chat, more of a clear the air discussion so we can move on to the secondary aspect of discussing future watches. Apologies to all who just want the problems to magically go away, but unless you address them they will continue to fester like an open wound.
Discuss the problems, learn the lessons, THEN move on.
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
Re: Chat with Chris 2016
Agreed, although it would appear to be only one of the three major shareholders; I.e. Mike.smegwina wrote:Can we please both accept and be grateful that it will be Mike and Chris and leave it at that.
To me it says volumes that despite all the spite and vitriol levelled at them over the past few weeks (I am also guilty of that), - they still have the decency and cojones to speak directly to us.
If however we turn this thread into a playground p155ing contest, the chances are that they will turn round and tell us to sod off.
I for one welcome the fact that two of the major shareholders are prepared to give their time and effort in getting involved.
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
Neil
Other watch forums of interest:
TZ-UK
TZ-UK
Re: Chat with Chris 2016
Nothing more, as long as the elephant in the room isn't ignored and they get the opportunity to deal with it rather than just move on to prettier discussions about new models as some people seem keen to do. If they don't review and deal with the issues from the rebrand and website upgrade', they will make the same mistakes again next time.smegwina wrote:You are chatting with the guys who signed off on the changes! What more do you want?Tyke wrote:If you all look back at the OP from kip, this IS a chat specifically 'regarding the recent rebranding and website upgrade' not about anything else, so it 's not a brush it under the carpet chat, more of a clear the air discussion so we can move on to the secondary aspect of discussing future watches. Apologies to all who just want the problems to magically go away, but unless you address them they will continue to fester like an open wound.
Discuss the problems, learn the lessons, THEN move on.
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 4 Replies
- 409 Views
-
Last post by Tonywalker
-
- 6 Replies
- 314 Views
-
Last post by SimonGermany