Absolute congratulations!! That's a fantastic looking CW and it does fit your wrist perfectly. I look forward to your outdoor pictures.
Great choice to mark your 40th Birthday!
1st CW Arrived
- Viognier
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 8:16 pm
- CW-watches: 2
- Location: Canada
Re: 1st CW Arrived
Small collection of timepieces that I enjoy
Re: 1st CW Arrived
One hell of a way to start your journey!
Wear in god health and keep safe,
C
Wear in god health and keep safe,
C
CW Watches (To Date): C65 Trident Vintage MK2, C65 Sandhurst, C65 Dartmouth, C60 Pro 300, C60 Pro 600 Vintage, C65 GMT.
Others (To Date): Sinn 104, Seiko SNA411, G-Shock, Seiko SKX007
Others (To Date): Sinn 104, Seiko SNA411, G-Shock, Seiko SKX007
-
- Senior
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 5:10 am
Re: 1st CW Arrived
12.95 height. 47.46 for lug to lug. As long as the lugs curve on a 42 I've been good. That's about my limit though.MichaelMD wrote:Size looks great on you. Good decision. What's the lug height on this model? I would use that as your upper limit. I think a 42 might look a little big on your judging from these pictures, but again might depend more on the lug-to-lug than the case diameter. This watch looks about perfect.
Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk
- Kansas City Milkman
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:08 pm
- CW-watches: 12
- Location: Surrey
Re: 1st CW Arrived
That’s a very nice watch. I was really struck by this watch when it was launched. Congrats.
Re: 1st CW Arrived
Seems like CW just prefers to use longer lugs for some reason. Just a style thing I guess. I know on my Worldglow the ends of the lugs are a good 2mm+ beyond the lug holes on each end. Yours looks similar in that regard. Looks like it fits you just fine either way. Their lugs do seem to curve at the end and are narrow so they can get away with longer ones.Dynamite_Kid19 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:46 pm12.95 height. 47.46 for lug to lug. As long as the lugs curve on a 42 I've been good. That's about my limit though.MichaelMD wrote:Size looks great on you. Good decision. What's the lug height on this model? I would use that as your upper limit. I think a 42 might look a little big on your judging from these pictures, but again might depend more on the lug-to-lug than the case diameter. This watch looks about perfect.
Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk