Its what we've all been waiting for . . . .. .

[welshlad]

Are there any lume pictures yet?

I haven't seen an official photo with lume yet, but the promotional video has a few frames showing the lume, about 24 seconds in. Here's a quick screen shot...

[Tortoise]

Height issue aside for a moment.... it's hard to not like it.
The unmistakable Trident characteristics, the light catcher case, the symmetry of the dial, the judicious use of colour accent..
A good offering IMHO..

[Caller]

There is nothing remarkable about this watch, just another generic offing in a market already overpopulated with chronograph style watches from any number of watchmakers. I think it would be better proportioned in a 43mm case as there is a lot of detail on this dial which seems to me a tad cluttered. Perhaps a different dial coloured variant would be more aesthetically pleasing to the eye .

Well, this saved me some writing time! I agree 100% with what you have written. A perfectly fine offering that doesn't shout out from the crowd.

[baldrick]

It looks good. Whilst I don’t mind a 30 minute counter on a more dress style Chronograph, I have always viewed a full 12 hour counter as far more useful on a tool watch Chronograph such as this.

Neil

Agreed - but pleased that the previous Micky-Mouse 'small seconds' aka 'Breather' has been abandoned !

Lol I quite liked the previous "breather"! At least it set the watch apart from others.

I think you had to view it as a stylised indicator that the watch was running, rather than anything else. Getting the lume charged up on it was a bit tough, mind....

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

[richtel]

I like where the brand name is positioned !

I'm not sure it could have been anywhere else

[CBMVic20]

This is the first CW I've really liked in ages. Shame about the height (and cost) but nice to see summat else instead of yet another military collection.

Already have 2 chrono's, need to convince myself I don't need another

[Toph]

The dial is stunning and the watch looks fantastic but 17.2 mmm Is a bit crazy for thickness.
I don’t even see the necessity for that thickness

[drand]

I like where the brand name is positioned !

I'm not sure it could have been anywhere else

I had wondered if they were considering a 12 & 6 bicompax with the logo at 9! Perhaps for the C65s...

[Tortoise]

The dial is stunning and the watch looks fantastic but 17.2 mmm Is a bit crazy for thickness.
I don’t even see the necessity for that thickness

Is it due to the 600m WR maybe?