I would buy that
Why no 3 hander sports watches
-
- Expert
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:27 pm
Re: Why no 3 hander sports watches
It was seeing this watch come up on eBay that sparked my post! But I’ve had a 43mm C65 (mk2) and it’s just too big for me. Everyone else thought it looked ok but I’m a stickler for proportion.FloridaPhil wrote: ↑Sun Aug 02, 2020 12:37 am This was ever so close. In 40mm I would still own it.
C65LE.jpg
The new mk3 trident hands lend themselves very well to a similar design as the mk1 LE but this may sail too close to the AT for some with the new arrow hands.
One of the reasons I love CW over say Steinhart is their original design language.
Dress C63 36mm
Dive C C63 36mm
Fly C63 36mm
Dive C C63 36mm
Fly C63 36mm
Re: Why no 3 hander sports watches
Beautiful concept . The polar model in 40mm would be particularly difficult for me to pass on, even more so if the the movement was chronometer certified...nordwulf wrote: ↑Tue Jul 28, 2020 2:24 pm This has been suggested for a while now but CW doesn't seem to be interested so far.
Thread from a few years ago: Casual, elegant and rugged CW explorer watch (viewtopic.php?f=1&t=49979)
Make this in a 40mm and I'll buy it. Made these a while ago.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 2 Replies
- 148 Views
-
Last post by Dickchins
-
- 4 Replies
- 580 Views
-
Last post by cward210
-
- 6 Replies
- 548 Views
-
Last post by Bahnstormer_vRS
-
- 52 Replies
- 1848 Views
-
Last post by TheBeatles