Quartz - no need to hide...

Discuss Christopher Ward watches
User avatar
nigelb001
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 1133
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2015 6:47 pm
CW-watches: 1
Location: South Wales

Re: Quartz - no need to hide...

Post by nigelb001 »

No problem with quartz here, I like to keep a variety of options. Although I have offloaded a lot of watches over the last couple of years, I have a mixture of movement types. Currently

3 Quartz
2 Manual wind
4 Automatic

I have to admit the quartz ones are my 'in a hurry, grab and go' watches. So no snobbery here....
CW C7 Rapide / Breitling Top Time + Superocean / Bulova Curv Titanium 98A162
Laco Memmingen / Tissot PR516GL Auto + PRS516 Auto + PRS516 Chrono / Seiko Padi Turtle
IanKelly63
Senior
Senior
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2019 1:03 pm
CW-watches: 3

Re: Quartz - no need to hide...

Post by IanKelly63 »

Currently wearing...Image

Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk

CW x 3
Others...
Casio x 8,Citizen x 2,Coen Anders x 1,Hamilton x 3,Ingersoll x 1,Junghans x 2,
Marloe x 2,Orient x 1,Rotary x 1,Seiko x 3,Swatch x 1,Tissot x 2
Noush
Senior
Senior
Posts: 140
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 12:30 am
CW-watches: 1
Location: Blue Mountains Australia

Re: Quartz - no need to hide...

Post by Noush »

This is a great subject to discuss. Personally I've poked around watch forums for some time "guest" without joining one.
When I did, I chose this one, even before buying a CW watch. Why? There is no snobbery here that I have detected.
My collection is rather modest and I've had no feeling ever that someone is looking down their nose at me.

End of the day, watches are watches, I/we buy them because they interest us for whatever reason and we'll get enjoyment from them.
I think THE thing about watches and places like this is the sheer variety and the reasons folks are loving them.
I do prefer a mechanical watch, there's something of a "life" about them. I also play vinyl records, there's the sound and the handling of them.
But digital has its place and so does quartz. My Chronoscope wouldn't be the watch it is without being quartz.

Just the same: I'm with MiniMpi on this one: chronographs using a small second hand are best :)
Chris
CW C65, Stowa Marine, Hamilton Khaki Field, Tissot Carson, Junghans Chronoscope, Seiko Cocktail Time, G Shock square, Phoibos Eagle Ray, Pagani Daytona & Batman.
IanKelly63
Senior
Senior
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2019 1:03 pm
CW-watches: 3

Re: Quartz - no need to hide...

Post by IanKelly63 »

Noush wrote:This is a great subject to discuss. Personally I've poked around watch forums for some time "guest" without joining one.
When I did, I chose this one, even before buying a CW watch. Why? There is no snobbery here that I have detected.
My collection is rather modest and I've had no feeling ever that someone is looking down their nose at me.

End of the day, watches are watches, I/we buy them because they interest us for whatever reason and we'll get enjoyment from them.
I think THE thing about watches and places like this is the sheer variety and the reasons folks are loving them.
I do prefer a mechanical watch, there's something of a "life" about them. I also play vinyl records, there's the sound and the handling of them.
But digital has its place and so does quartz. My Chronoscope wouldn't be the watch it is without being quartz.

Just the same: I'm with MiniMpi on this one: chronographs using a small second hand are best :)
Totally agree!

Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk

CW x 3
Others...
Casio x 8,Citizen x 2,Coen Anders x 1,Hamilton x 3,Ingersoll x 1,Junghans x 2,
Marloe x 2,Orient x 1,Rotary x 1,Seiko x 3,Swatch x 1,Tissot x 2
User avatar
Amor Vincit Omnia
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 22501
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 7:34 pm
CW-watches: 4
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Quartz - no need to hide...

Post by Amor Vincit Omnia »

Noush wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2020 9:33 pm

Just the same: I'm with MiniMpi on this one: chronographs using a small second hand are best :)
The seconds hand thing has never bothered me really. I know some people are devotees of the perfect, seamless sweep, but it doesn't rank among my highest priorities.

When you come to think about it, there are some very expensive mechanicals out there with a complication that perfectly imitates quartz: the jumping, or dead-beat, seconds. And what could be finer than the perfect one-second tick of a longcase clock.

Just one caveat, though. I hate quartz seconds hands that don't hit the marks all the way round. That's just sloppy.
Steve
The half minute which we daily devote to the winding-up of our watches is an exertion of labour almost insensible; yet, by the aid of a few wheels, its effect is spread over the whole twenty-four hours.
Charles Babbage


@Avo238
IanKelly63
Senior
Senior
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2019 1:03 pm
CW-watches: 3

Re: Quartz - no need to hide...

Post by IanKelly63 »

Amor Vincit Omnia wrote:
Noush wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2020 9:33 pm

Just the same: I'm with MiniMpi on this one: chronographs using a small second hand are best :)
The seconds hand thing has never bothered me really. I know some people are devotees of the perfect, seamless sweep, but it doesn't rank among my highest priorities.

When you come to think about it, there are some very expensive mechanicals out there with a complication that perfectly imitates quartz: the jumping, or dead-beat, seconds. And what could be finer than the perfect one-second tick of a longcase clock.

Just one caveat, though. I hate quartz seconds hands that don't hit the marks all the way round. That's just sloppy.
"Quartz second hands that don't hit the marks all the way round".

I'm glad to hear that it's not just me.... drives me insane.

I remember a few years ago, I wanted a Tissot Tradition quartz. I looked at 8 different watches in 3 different ADs... all of them were off! Suffice to say, I don't own a Tissot Tradition.

I've got a couple of Citizen quartz watches in the £400/500 bracket and they are bang on. And then again, I have a £30 Swatch which is spot on... Maybe I got lucky!

Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk

CW x 3
Others...
Casio x 8,Citizen x 2,Coen Anders x 1,Hamilton x 3,Ingersoll x 1,Junghans x 2,
Marloe x 2,Orient x 1,Rotary x 1,Seiko x 3,Swatch x 1,Tissot x 2
User avatar
strapline
Senior
Senior
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 3:00 pm
CW-watches: 0
Location: SW Ireland

Re: Quartz - no need to hide...

Post by strapline »

There are also some good quality quartz movements, that will have rubies around pinions and gold plated movements etc. They are also built with servicing them in mind, they are not a throw away item. I still like holding a good quality quartz to my ear and hearing that 'definite' tick. In a well made case it can have a lovely resonance.But as was mentioned earlier, a watch that fails to hit its minute markers is a no go.
I'm a tool watch kinda guy; bezels and pushers for me. I used to dive, I used to climb mountains. I spend too much time looking at watches.
User avatar
MiniMpi
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 34644
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:56 am
CW-watches: 21
Location: Cork, Ireland

Re: Quartz - no need to hide...

Post by MiniMpi »

angusbon wrote:
Tue Feb 11, 2020 5:12 pm
MiniMpi wrote:Currently I have 6 quartz out of a collection of 21 watches.

I think your trio Steve shows why I love my one's too, they are nearly all chronograph models.
I find it best for me personally to have a quartz in a chronograph as you don't have the large second hand which is very obviously a quartz in it's movement.
Not hiding the fact that they are quartz, just that they are easier to live with personally.
I would happily take every single one of those Ferg Image

Cheers Chris :) :thumbup:
Ferg

21 CW watches and a 1934 Rolex 912 'Tank'.

Check out my Instagram @minimpi610
Post Reply