i agree that the crux of this topic was supposed to be about the 60/60. However, it veered into another area where opinions were being stated and seemed to be getting accepted as facts regarding service. I simply wanted to correct that.Mikkei4 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 22, 2019 6:42 pm A comprehensive post from Kip regarding the myths or truths re. watch servicing and old and new lubricants.
The only problem is that the crux of this topic is what is considered as a change by CW to the length of their warranty BEFORE 1 of their watches is to be serviced. Whether it is said by anybody that it's the watch's owner that decide whether to follow recommendations or not it is CW that have now put their 60month movement warranty into doubt.
BUT they still advertise it as 60/60 which it is not.
That is the crux of this topic.
As to the 60/60,I have already expressed my opinion on that so we shall have to agree to disagree.