CW c65 Automatic vs. Oris Sixty-Five (Movember)

Discuss Christopher Ward watches
0uatiOW
Guru
Guru
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2018 11:46 pm
CW-watches: 4
Location: Cambridgeshire

Re: CW c65 Automatic vs. Oris Sixty-Five (Movember)

Post by 0uatiOW » Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:23 pm

Head to head, watch only without considering the price, I would choose the Oris. On Oris’s side, the selection of models in the 65 Diver range is broad - with the 65 and the 65 Vintage, both available in several colours. The bronze-edged bezel is a nice detail, but that model isn’t really comparing like with like.

At RRP, I’m my view, the Oris doesn’t justify the extra cost, nice as it is. Mind you, you don’t expect to pay RRP for either of them.
My name is 0uatiOW, but before you ask, no I don’t.

albionphoto
Senior Guru
Senior Guru
Posts: 788
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:07 pm
CW-watches: 5
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: CW c65 Automatic vs. Oris Sixty-Five (Movember)

Post by albionphoto » Mon Apr 15, 2019 11:29 am

The picture you posted is of the Oris Movember limited edition from 2017. I own one. It is a very nice watch. The picture doesn't show the rose gold plating on the hands and indices very well. It is small (40mm) with a box sapphire crystal. The back is stainless steel with a nice engraving of the Oris flag on it. Mine keeps good time (+3.5 s/day). The original Movember strap with the moustache on it is really horrible. It's very stiff and didn't really break in at all. I replaced it for a geckota strap immediately upon getting the watch. It does come with a Nato strap but I didn't like that either. This was expensive in the US (~ $1,800) on launch in 2017. I had to go through Oris themselves to buy one because it wasn't officially sold in the US. The lume is OK but not up to Oris' normal standards.

Is it better than the C65? I don't own a C65. Some of the price of the Oris goes to the Movember charity. In terms of value for money the winner is the C65, in terms of rarity and charm I'd say it goes to the Oris.
Mark
Muehle Glashutte, Omega, Oris and Christopher Ward.

User avatar
Thegreyman
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 7623
Joined: Sat May 21, 2016 3:45 pm
CW-watches: 3
Location: Edinburgh

Re: CW c65 Automatic vs. Oris Sixty-Five (Movember)

Post by Thegreyman » Mon Apr 15, 2019 2:15 pm

The Oris is a good looking watch on the whole with dial symmetry and date centred at 6 o clock. The CW has a cleaner bezel without the minute tracks that clutter up the Oris. In a straight fight on looks the Oris might just fractionally edge it but taking into account price the CW seems a better option.
Patrick

C11 Makaira Pro, C60 FLE Scooter Blue, W11(wife)

Some others + a few on the way

John Price
Junior
Junior
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2015 12:44 am

Re: CW c65 Automatic vs. Oris Sixty-Five (Movember)

Post by John Price » Mon Apr 15, 2019 7:00 pm

Also, take a look at the case designs. Here I think the C65 beats the Oris as well.

Bando4444
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2019 9:30 am

Re: CW c65 Automatic vs. Oris Sixty-Five (Movember)

Post by Bando4444 » Tue Apr 16, 2019 9:20 am

CW all the way

angusbon
Senior
Senior
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2018 12:41 pm

Re: CW c65 Automatic vs. Oris Sixty-Five (Movember)

Post by angusbon » Tue Apr 16, 2019 8:12 pm

Oris all the way. Heritage, brand recognition, longevity....
I have a c65 handwound and love it, but imo in the vintage Diver category the Oris 65 just can't be beaten

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk


User avatar
timor54
Guru
Guru
Posts: 358
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 1:44 pm

Re: CW c65 Automatic vs. Oris Sixty-Five (Movember)

Post by timor54 » Tue Apr 16, 2019 9:08 pm

Chris Ward (I believe?) admitted that the C65 design was in essence based upon the Oris Diver 65.

I think the handwound C65 is the most original (and IMO the best) of the C65 models; whilst the others, in particular the auto, are rather derivative.
Tim

Post Reply