https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/busi ... -dgtk76zhfJaguar is revving up for a legal battle with the luxury watch maker Christopher Ward.
Between 2014 and 2016, Christopher Ward sold D-Type watches, named after the Jaguar model of the same name. The car maker alleges that by selling the watches — which cost between £449 and £2,995 — Christopher Ward infringed its trademark and damaged the “distinctive character” of its marque. Christopher Ward sourced metal from some of the cars to make the “limited edition” £2,995 watches.
The D-Type is one of Jaguar’s best-known sports cars and won Le Mans for three consecutive years between 1955 and 1957. Only 75 were built, but in February, Jaguar said it would build a further 25. All sold for more than £1.5m each.
Christopher Ward said last night that it would “vigorously” defend itself.
Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 8:59 pm
Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
Just saw this on The Sunday Times and thought people here would be interested:
-
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 4109
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:50 pm
- CW-watches: 2
- Location: Hampshire, UK
Re: Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
I think we'd assumed CW would do these art metal pieces in partnership with the brands they're using in their marketing. Oops.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 8:59 pm
Re: Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
The wording was always carefully done to *imply* this but never actually state it...
It is curious to me why there is such a gap between the watches and action - I premese there have been discussions behind the scenes for a while and Jaguar feel that they haven't had the right response.
- Kip
- The Administrator
- Posts: 35171
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:45 pm
- CW-watches: 150
- LE-one: yes
- LE-two: yes
- LE-three: yes
- LE-foura: yes
- LE-fourb: yes
- LE-five: yes
- LE-six: yes
- LESeven: yes
- Location: New Hampshire, USA
Re: Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
I am no lawyer, but do not see why it should be assumed there was a collaboration. The marketing made it clear this was a tribute piece and contained metal from a wheel spinner. To me this seems quite a stretch for a lawsuit.
Being typed on my D-Type computer.
Being typed on my D-Type computer.
Kip
"Asylum Administrator"
Visit the CWArchives for everything CW. Historical, specs, manuals and resale. It is all there.
"Asylum Administrator"
Visit the CWArchives for everything CW. Historical, specs, manuals and resale. It is all there.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 8:59 pm
Re: Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
I would guess the argument is that it is 'passing off' that the marketing was deliberately designed to take advantage of trademarks owned by Jaguar and benefit by association.
Anyone got any of the original marketing copy to hand?
- Clach77
- Trusted Seller
- Posts: 2510
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:40 am
- CW-watches: 24
- LE-one: yes
- LE-two: yes
- LE-foura: yes
- LE-fourb: yes
- Location: Wasting time on here.
Re: Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
Looks like good publicity for Christoper Ward to me.
If they lose it’s not such good news, especially as other brands may want to look at the case.
If they lose it’s not such good news, especially as other brands may want to look at the case.
Trying not to buy any more watches...
Re: Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
Perhaps because Jaguar has a partnership with Bremont, so there is a conflicting watch link in place?
I've commented several times in the past about CW playing fast and loose with other people's brands, notably Wimbledon but also Formula 1 & Jaguar. Most of my postings got shot down for daring to suggest they were infringing trademarks.........
I've commented several times in the past about CW playing fast and loose with other people's brands, notably Wimbledon but also Formula 1 & Jaguar. Most of my postings got shot down for daring to suggest they were infringing trademarks.........
Re: Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
I would venture that Mr. Ward himself probably has more connection to the D-type than does the current Indian owned Tata Group that has been the parent company to JLR Ltd. for the past decade.
Mark
CW - C8 Flyer, C6 JHMk3, C7 Corsa Rosso LE, C3 Chronograph, C8 Reg | TAG Heuer F1 | Orient - Black Raven II, Bambino, Star Seeker GMT, Galant, Monarch | Seagull - Grn Military, Moon Phase | Tissot - Visodate | Steinhart - NavA Pilot MW, NavB Vintage
CW - C8 Flyer, C6 JHMk3, C7 Corsa Rosso LE, C3 Chronograph, C8 Reg | TAG Heuer F1 | Orient - Black Raven II, Bambino, Star Seeker GMT, Galant, Monarch | Seagull - Grn Military, Moon Phase | Tissot - Visodate | Steinhart - NavA Pilot MW, NavB Vintage
- Kip
- The Administrator
- Posts: 35171
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:45 pm
- CW-watches: 150
- LE-one: yes
- LE-two: yes
- LE-three: yes
- LE-foura: yes
- LE-fourb: yes
- LE-five: yes
- LE-six: yes
- LESeven: yes
- Location: New Hampshire, USA
Re: Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
I don't have any marketing materials, but the manual clearly gives kudos to the Jaguar D-Type itself and mentions that the watch is a "tribute" to the 1954 winning car. No mention of any collaboration, other than TMB.
Kip
"Asylum Administrator"
Visit the CWArchives for everything CW. Historical, specs, manuals and resale. It is all there.
"Asylum Administrator"
Visit the CWArchives for everything CW. Historical, specs, manuals and resale. It is all there.
- jkbarnes
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 7852
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2017 8:39 pm
- CW-watches: 3
- Location: Virginia, USA
Re: Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
I’m not a lawyer, but I do watch a lot of Law & Order, so here’s my $.02...
I would think making specific reference to Jaguar in any way in the literature and documentation, both referencing the name and including trademarked logos, sets CW up for trouble. I’m a guitar guy in addition to a watch guy. In advertising, it’s oretty common to see other manufacturers reference T-style and S-style guitars rather than refer directly to Telecasters and Stratocasters since those names are trademarked by Fender.
CW might argue any reference their making is purely historical, but it’s still being made in a capacity that is fundamentally commercial in nature.
This should be interesting.
I would think making specific reference to Jaguar in any way in the literature and documentation, both referencing the name and including trademarked logos, sets CW up for trouble. I’m a guitar guy in addition to a watch guy. In advertising, it’s oretty common to see other manufacturers reference T-style and S-style guitars rather than refer directly to Telecasters and Stratocasters since those names are trademarked by Fender.
CW might argue any reference their making is purely historical, but it’s still being made in a capacity that is fundamentally commercial in nature.
This should be interesting.
Drew
-
- Trusted Seller
- Posts: 3854
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2016 11:53 am
- CW-watches: 1
Re: Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
In my opinion they shouldn't have used the model name C9 D Type and should have been more creative, especially as Bremont have an official relationship with Jaguar and the Bremont E Type watch.
I'm sure CW knew what they were doing, because using the D Type name would help with sales and I believe this watch had full page ads in the likes of EVO, Octane mags etc where the readership know their cars and history.
Amazed that this wasn't agreed with Jaguar at the time.
I'm sure CW knew what they were doing, because using the D Type name would help with sales and I believe this watch had full page ads in the likes of EVO, Octane mags etc where the readership know their cars and history.
Amazed that this wasn't agreed with Jaguar at the time.
Current collection incl Citizen, G-Shock, Rolex, Seiko, Sinn & Tag.
Chris
Chris
- mabotham
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:10 am
- CW-watches: 5
- LE-two: yes
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
Just about to post as I sit down with today's paper !!!
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
- theemaadhatter
- Senior Expert
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:00 am
- CW-watches: 8
- Location: Vermont, USA
Re: Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
aww.
TMH (https://watchcomplications.com)
"it is maddening choosing your outfit based on the watch you want to wear..."
"it is maddening choosing your outfit based on the watch you want to wear..."
- Caller
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:44 pm
- CW-watches: 2
- Location: Hua Hin, Thailand
Re: Jaguar to sue Christopher Ward
Interesting to see what happens in this case.
It could be the opening salvo, or as suggested above, the last resort after failed negotiations. Does anyone know what Jaguar are after as they hardly need the money? Maybe they have become aware of plans for something similar, either by CW or someone else and intend to put a marker down?
It's pretty damning if they win, and apart from the obvious trademark issues, surely it's more difficult to prove it damaged the “distinctive character” of its marque, which will mean analysing the design, would it not? Imagine a debate in court about the aesthetic qualities of the watch!
But CW have only got themselves to blame for this. They knew they weren't doing this with the agreement of Jaguar and must have known about Bremont and it was always sailing pretty close to the wind. I always thought the GT40 was pretty close to plagiarism.
It could be the opening salvo, or as suggested above, the last resort after failed negotiations. Does anyone know what Jaguar are after as they hardly need the money? Maybe they have become aware of plans for something similar, either by CW or someone else and intend to put a marker down?
It's pretty damning if they win, and apart from the obvious trademark issues, surely it's more difficult to prove it damaged the “distinctive character” of its marque, which will mean analysing the design, would it not? Imagine a debate in court about the aesthetic qualities of the watch!
But CW have only got themselves to blame for this. They knew they weren't doing this with the agreement of Jaguar and must have known about Bremont and it was always sailing pretty close to the wind. I always thought the GT40 was pretty close to plagiarism.
'Tis me
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 34 Replies
- 998 Views
-
Last post by TheBeatles
-
- 10 Replies
- 872 Views
-
Last post by JAFO