Thanks! Where did you find this image? Looks like someone removed my name from my design..Rhorya wrote:I don’t know who did this but it would be brilliant!
http://horology.world/forums/topic/35-d ... w-watches/
Thanks! Where did you find this image? Looks like someone removed my name from my design..Rhorya wrote:I don’t know who did this but it would be brilliant!
I think you'll find that Omega did it about 5 years ago.nordwulf wrote:Rhorya wrote:The GMT just doesn’t quite do it for me. I would Love this one if CW would do it. It’s not my photo but one I found somewhere and fell in love with as a potential CW GMT.
I don’t know who did this but it would be brilliant!
Yes, the vintage lume is getting a bit overplayed.downer wrote:I like it. I imagine I'd like it even more with regular lume, rather than vintage lume.
nordwulf wrote:Yes, the vintage lume is getting a bit long in the tooth.downer wrote:I like it. I imagine I'd like it even more with regular lume, rather than vintage lume.
Modern version with smaller GMT hand in muted orange.
True, but I’d like to see it freshened up for a lot less!Caller wrote:I think you'll find that Omega did it about 5 years ago.nordwulf wrote:Rhorya wrote:The GMT just doesn’t quite do it for me. I would Love this one if CW would do it. It’s not my photo but one I found somewhere and fell in love with as a potential CW GMT.
I don’t know who did this but it would be brilliant!
Dude if you did this I love it! I copied it from somewhere here in one of these forums it’s been a while but I loved it when I saw it and had to save it in case I could never find it again. I actually sent a copy to Chris and begged him to consider this! I’d definitely purchase one with the 2893-2!nordwulf wrote:Thanks! Where did you find this image? Looks like someone removed my name from my design..Rhorya wrote:The GMT just doesn’t quite do it for me. I would Love this one if CW would do it. It’s not my photo but one I found somewhere and fell in love with as a potential CW GMT.
I don’t know who did this but it would be brilliant!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
http://horology.world/forums/topic/35-d ... w-watches/
I tried but turning black (no color really) into a real color is not that easy in the software I use. So for now you have to use your imagination.Mikkei4 wrote:Looks better than the released version IMO - Frank, please could you do me a favour and show your version with the blue colour of the dial from the C65 Trident Diver if it's not a major piece of work for you?
I know it's been said before but CW should pass their designs past you before final versions are decided upon.
Thanks for explaining the problem re.the blue.nordwulf wrote:I tried but turning black (no color really) into a real color is not that easy in the software I use. So for now you have to use your imagination.
How about smaller GMT hand and with the vintage CW logo?
I would buy that.nordwulf wrote:Yes, the vintage lume is getting a bit overplayed.downer wrote:I like it. I imagine I'd like it even more with regular lume, rather than vintage lume.
Modern version with smaller GMT hand in muted orange.
How come?kygan00 wrote:CW has some nice watches. Too bad it is suffering from identity crisis due to its lack of distinctive logo
Identity Crisis?? Whether you like the logo or whether you don’t, it is no identity crisis. Chris W has explained the rationale and thinking behind the logo and it is a clear direction that they wish to go in. Hardly an identity crisis is it?kygan00 wrote:CW has some nice watches. Too bad it is suffering from identity crisis due to its lack of distinctive logo