Nice essay & watch!

I guess it'll look very great on the leather straps too!

joerattz wrote:

Warhol wrote:Still don't like the fact it has a glass back...

Why? Worried about the WR? I still say, if the movement is nice, don't hide it.

Because it don't fits to the image of a diver. Neither do I like diver chronographs: why should a diver have a chronograph if you can't use it under water?!

Hmm.. you're right! But they don't have that one on their site...

Still don't like the fact it has a glass back...

El Tiempo wrote:

MYND wrote:Iam 20 years old.

Maybe I confused you with Warhol.

Yeah.. but I just turend 17

43 mm is rather big.. but it's a diver so I guess it's quite OK.

zach471 wrote:Tell that to Glashutte Original. That's one serious diver with one serious display back.

GO doesn't make any divers...

zach471 wrote:I hope there's a huge piece of sapphire crystal on the back to get a gander of the movement.

I really don't. Divers should have closed backs.

This one is BEAUTIFUL!

Hans wrote:As a kid I played it for a few years until I was 12 or so... Now I'm picking it up again...

Same here.. but I'm already playing again. So I had a pause of 4 years or so.

VERY nice pic btw!

Nice story.

Congrats with your watch, it's a nice one

This is what CW had to say about our thoughts! Interesting discussion....especially about the bombs in the movies..... Ive watched with interest and picked out the bonesof the thread as below....this will go into the design melting pot, and hopefully help us shape our thinking on the Divers Watch......

I like the malvern better with ivory than the blakc dial, so I think that the aviator would be nicer too with ivory dial.

What do you guys think?

I forgot the post what I prefer:

I'd like to see a count-down bezel, as it is more usefull and very original!

Hi Guys, Chris asked me to post this: ………. I am interested in what you guys think as it does shape our thinking. The question …. born out of a desire to challenge conventional thinking….. and as an avid diver myself…. If you were a diver, and assuming you understand diving, and further assuming that...

Great review, great pictures, great watch!

A have to admit that the price/quality rate of a CW still is excellent!

Still I think it's too expensive if you compare it to what I paid for my Malvern: Don't get me wrong, the higher the ratio of quality to price, the more I like it. But, even at the newer prices, there just aren't a lot of alternatives that are less expensive. If you know of any, please post them be...