Christopher Ward Forum

Looks good to me

at 0% and if i knew i was good for it for the term then yes id go for it.

Looks great, congrats

willttqs wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:35 am

I must say I do like this a great deal. It has a bit of deep sea Rolex about it with the inner markings. Tough choice though between this and a used pelagos (two line) though.

Pelagos all day long

people blindly defending CW's crappy PR NHS stunt.

That Reverso, hubba hubba

Isn’t there 3-4 grades of finish/standard to any one single ETA movement? Think when Omega, Breitling etc use them they have one of the top options plus a bit of there own DNA finish on them. That said Steinhart do use the good ones I think

^^^Agreed^^^

When things like 'Phenomenal quality' are mentioned and people owning Rolex, Zenith etc saying 'why would anyone want anything more' (is he going to sell everything then and buy a CW? NO.) it gets my back up as everything has +/-'s but to be blindly fanboying just doesn't sit right with me. IMO they...

Sorry, meant more specifically the QR bracelet. I do also think that CW are not highly praised in the general watch world (excluding the CW favs and ones they give freebies to or paid to say nice things) Im not saying that they are not good but if they are as good as some think/say then surely they ...

Im not trying to pee on the parade but if it is so amazing why is it not getting recognised as such in the industry?

40mm

Howdy again partner

imho the height combined with it onyl being 38mm makes it too stubby. go 40mm