Some say the hands are too short...

downer · Post by **downer** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:55 pm

I say I want one.

androo · Post by **androo** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:57 pm

The hands look too short

downer · Post by **downer** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:04 pm

androo wrote:The hands look too short

ianblyth · Post by **ianblyth** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:08 pm

androo wrote:The hands look too short

No the crown looks too short.

downer · Post by **downer** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:14 pm

ianblyth wrote:
androo wrote:The hands look too short
No the crown looks too short.

These things are so accurate, you barely even need a crown.

androo · Post by **androo** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:19 pm

Actually really like that. But on a serious note the hands are too short

you were right in the title

jmarchitect · Post by **jmarchitect** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:36 pm

I think the hands and the crown are too short, the sunken crown detail is cheap looking and the dial looks cluttered, even though is is only a GMT. Oh and the GMT hand isn't in symphony with the other hands and the rehaut looks vast. Other than that I like what they have done with the piece.

alphajet · Post by **alphajet** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:16 pm

I like that, new in-house movement as well.

There is a larger pic on TimeZone http://forums.timezone.com/index.php?t= ... 2054&rid=0

SwampDonkey · Post by **SwampDonkey** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 6:37 pm

I agree about the hands being too short but I'm also worried about how the GMT track goes 11 - 8 - 13!

alphajet · Post by **alphajet** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 6:47 pm

SwampDonkey wrote:I agree about the hands being too short but I'm also worried about how the GMT track goes 11 - 8 - 13!

Could only wear it on the 12th of the month then.

redd · Post by **redd** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:05 pm

Yeah it has it's flaws, but doesn't it hide them well with the overall design.

Mortis · Post by **Mortis** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 8:25 pm

Looks like a C9 or Speedbird 3 rip-off. No thanks, much prefer the "normal" versions.

Loddonite · Post by **Loddonite** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:58 pm

Those hands are positively stunted.

Lamps · Post by **Lamps** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:21 pm

Looks good, but the hour hand looks very odd to me.

Kip · Post by **Kip** » Tue Jan 10, 2012 4:37 am

A perfectly wonderful model ruined by the hands.

Christopher Ward Forum

Christopher Ward Forum

Some say the hands are too short...

Some say the hands are too short...

Re: Some say the hands are too short...

Re: Some say the hands are too short...

Re: Some say the hands are too short...

Re: Some say the hands are too short...

Re: Some say the hands are too short...

Re: Some say the hands are too short...

Re: Some say the hands are too short...

Re: Some say the hands are too short...

Re: Some say the hands are too short...

Re: Some say the hands are too short...

Re: Some say the hands are too short...

Re: Some say the hands are too short...

Re: Some say the hands are too short...

Re: Some say the hands are too short...

Independently Operated Forum for CW Enthusiasts