Non CW of the Day

A place to discuss other watch-brands
User avatar
Korkki
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 7447
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:19 pm
CW-watches: 0
Location: Oulu, Finland

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by Korkki »

Image
NO PARKING
This space is reserved
User avatar
Winnie Bloo
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 2494
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 5:36 pm
CW-watches: 0

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by Winnie Bloo »

It's our village pensioners doooooooo :D

Cracking local wine and spirits :thumbup:

Image

And by crikey it's hot!!
The Ultimate Postman has delivered his last package.

Dave :wave:
willykatie
Junior
Junior
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 10:13 pm

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by willykatie »

Boydesian wrote:Old pic:
Image
Ooo I like that Tudor. Is that the Black Bay 41mm with blue bezel? I've been looking at either Omega Seamaster 300 41mm or Tudor Black Bay with Blue Bezel for sometimes next year. Would like the Pelagos but I think it's going to be massive on my tiny wrist [SMILING FACE WITH OPEN MOUTH AND SMILING EYES].

Is the Black Bay wears smaller than it looks or bigger? Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
sinner777
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 1840
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 10:43 am
CW-watches: 1
Location: Zagreb. Croatia

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by sinner777 »

Image
User avatar
downer
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 25568
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: UK

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by downer »

Image
Richard
User avatar
Thermexman
Trusted Seller
Trusted Seller
Posts: 6228
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:40 am
CW-watches: 4
Location: South West UK

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by Thermexman »

Posted this on the CWOTD thread by mistake. Like no ones ever done that before? Been sent packing with my head bowed in shame! I'm really really sorry. :lol:

Image
Steve.
kiter65
Trusted Seller
Trusted Seller
Posts: 4025
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 2:45 pm
CW-watches: 0

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by kiter65 »

willykatie wrote:
Boydesian wrote:Old pic:
Image
Ooo I like that Tudor. Is that the Black Bay 41mm with blue bezel? I've been looking at either Omega Seamaster 300 41mm or Tudor Black Bay with Blue Bezel for sometimes next year. Would like the Pelagos but I think it's going to be massive on my tiny wrist [SMILING FACE WITH OPEN MOUTH AND SMILING EYES].

Is the Black Bay wears smaller than it looks or bigger? Thanks


Image


This may help different BB but same size next to a 41mm Seamaster the only way to get a true feeling is to try them on
I find the Pelagos too big
User avatar
ItsAliveJim
Trusted Seller
Trusted Seller
Posts: 7726
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:07 pm

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by ItsAliveJim »

We're discovering some beautiful little towns on our travels, such as Semur-en-Auxois

Image
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"What the hell is he building in there?" Tom Waits
willykatie
Junior
Junior
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 10:13 pm

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by willykatie »

kiter65 wrote:
willykatie wrote:
Boydesian wrote:

This may help different BB but same size next to a 41mm Seamaster the only way to get a true feeling is to try them on
I find the Pelagos too big
Thanks for the picture.

That BB looks bigger than the Seamaster. Probably it will wear slightly bigger than the actual size. I did try the Seamaster and wears small actually and fits my tiny wrist perfectly compare to my Aquis [SMILING FACE WITH OPEN MOUTH AND SMILING EYES]. Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
smegwina
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 11771
Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 10:04 am
CW-watches: 11

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by smegwina »

Thegreyman wrote:^^^every one of today's selections look superb :clap:

I'm liking the Tag F1 panda which looks great on that Steveo. Also is that the Bremont Zulu that was in SC Nick, looks like a real bargain :thumbup:
Thanks Patrick,

As Neil said, I bought it at the same time as DM from Beaverbrooks. I thought that I would start a little Bremont sub collection!

Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
User avatar
Boydesian
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 1000
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2014 6:27 pm
CW-watches: 7
Location: New Hampshire (USA)

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by Boydesian »

willykatie wrote:
Boydesian wrote:Old pic:
Ooo I like that Tudor. Is that the Black Bay 41mm with blue bezel? I've been looking at either Omega Seamaster 300 41mm or Tudor Black Bay with Blue Bezel for sometimes next year. Would like the Pelagos but I think it's going to be massive on my tiny wrist [SMILING FACE WITH OPEN MOUTH AND SMILING EYES].

Is the Black Bay wears smaller than it looks or bigger? Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes. That is an ETA-powered, blue bezel Black Bay. I too, initially went for the Pelagos, but it was just too bulky in my eyes. I tried on the Black Bay, and walked out with it a half hour later. My wrist measures 7.25 inches (just under 18.5 cm), and for me the Black Bay is in a Goldilocks Zone; not too big, or too small. I absolutely love it!

That being so, I must say that I do not like the new, in-house powered Black Bays. First of all, they ditched the classic Tudor Rose in favor of the rather pedestrian shield logo, they now come with needless chronometer certification, and then went and put them on a riveted bracelet that I think is kind of ugly. I think if I went in for a new Tudor today, I would walk out of the store with an Omega instead (but it would be an Aqua Terra, not a dive watch). I would advise that you try a little-worn, previously owned ETA Black Bay if your heart is set on one. You should be able to pick one up for less money than new (at least in the short run) and to me they just look better. All of the above are my own, subjective opinions I know, so whatever you end up doing, I wish you all the best.
Whare hae ye been sae braw, lad?
Whare hae ye been sae brankie, O?
Whare hae ye been sae braw, lad?
Came ye by Killiecrankie, O?
atnits
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 3743
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:21 pm
Location: England

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by atnits »

nbg wrote:Image
Neil
Saw 3 of these in town today. My, they look good.
willykatie
Junior
Junior
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 10:13 pm

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by willykatie »

Boydesian wrote:
willykatie wrote:
Boydesian wrote:Old pic:
Ooo I like that Tudor. Is that the Black Bay 41mm with blue bezel? I've been looking at either Omega Seamaster 300 41mm or Tudor Black Bay with Blue Bezel for sometimes next year. Would like the Pelagos but I think it's going to be massive on my tiny wrist [SMILING FACE WITH OPEN MOUTH AND SMILING EYES].

Is the Black Bay wears smaller than it looks or bigger? Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes. That is an ETA-powered, blue bezel Black Bay. I too, initially went for the Pelagos, but it was just too bulky in my eyes. I tried on the Black Bay, and walked out with it a half hour later. My wrist measures 7.25 inches (just under 18.5 cm), and for me the Black Bay is in a Goldilocks Zone; not too big, or too small. I absolutely love it!

That being so, I must say that I do not like the new, in-house powered Black Bays. First of all, they ditched the classic Tudor Rose in favor of the rather pedestrian shield logo, they now come with needless chronometer certification, and then went and put them on a riveted bracelet that I think is kind of ugly. I think if I went in for a new Tudor today, I would walk out of the store with an Omega instead (but it would be an Aqua Terra, not a dive watch). I would advise that you try a little-worn, previously owned ETA Black Bay if your heart is set on one. You should be able to pick one up for less money than new (at least in the short run) and to me they just look better. All of the above are my own, subjective opinions I know, so whatever you end up doing, I wish you all the best.
Thanks for the info.

I did watch a few reviews on YouTube and most of the reviewers did say the same that they're not sure about the new in house movement even though has higher power reserve, I think 70 hours? I wonder it's because a new movement and nothing wrong with the old ETA movement :)

I'll check and probably try one next year as if do it now I probably end up getting it and put myself into debt [SMILING FACE WITH OPEN MOUTH AND SMILING EYES]

Thanks




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
blowfish89
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 7433
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:45 pm
LE-three: yes
Location: Toronto

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by blowfish89 »

Image

Riding rollercoasters in Florida today
User avatar
gaf1958
Trusted Seller
Trusted Seller
Posts: 12431
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 6:24 am
CW-watches: 24
Location: ɐᴉlɐɹʇsn∀ 'ʇsɐoƆ ǝuᴉɥsunS

Re: Non CW of the Day

Post by gaf1958 »

Thermexman wrote:Posted this on the CWOTD thread by mistake. Like no ones ever done that before? Been sent packing with my head bowed in shame! I'm really really sorry. :lol:

Image
Oh god no, I've never done that :wink: - just as I didn't have footy & co take the p*** out of me for it before I could correct it. No, didn't happen to me....
CW C1+2xC3+6xC6/60K+C7+C11+3xC60T+2xC65+C90+2xC600
Omega Ω 11xSpeedy+14xSeamaster+4xConnie+DeVille
Cartier+2xPanerai+2xFarer+2xOris+Sinn+11xSeiko+ManyVintage
B&R+Halios+5xVisitor+TagH+6xTissot+2xZelos+4xCertina+more
Family12xCW+2xΩ+Cartier