Mikkei4 wrote:
Why have you got a Rolex watch photo on a Omega Speedy Tuesday magazine? Co-ordination please.
Well nothing else in the photo coordinated, Rolex don't send me magazines, it stopped the bracelet scratching on the table and I am pleased about having a Speedy Tuesday on the way, so I mention it as often as possible!
Mikkei4 wrote:
Why have you got a Rolex watch photo on a Omega Speedy Tuesday magazine? Co-ordination please.
Well nothing else in the photo coordinated, Rolex don't send me magazines, it stopped the bracelet scratching on the table and I am pleased about having a Speedy Tuesday on the way, so I mention it as often as possible!
Neil
It is worth the wait
Excellent. Looks great with the bracelet. Have you tried it on anything else yet?
nbg wrote:Excellent. Looks great with the bracelet. Have you tried it on anything else yet?
Neil
Thanks, yep tried it on a few straps, the supplied strap is actually much nicer than I first thought aswell. My preference is the 1171 bracelet though which is what I've been wearing it on pretty much since I received it a few weeks ago.
Hirsch Rally
I don't like the supplied NATO, but I do like it on a similar but thinner/cheaper NATO.
Not saying I'm jealous, mind you... but that's lovely and yes, I'm positively green with envy.
Edit: 1171 bracelet is an interesting choice, did you choose it because it's lighter (and more flexible) than the modern bracelets? I have an 1162 on my Mark II and sometimes think I should get an 1171 for my late sixties Seamaster 300, which been on a modern Broad Arrow bracelet for ages.
I told DM a couple of days ago I'd post an Animal watch. I've been a bit tardy in that respect, but here it is. Not as out there with the dial colours and design as his, but the case and bracelet are far from the usual watches seen here. What looks like an integrated bracelet is actually a removable bracelet with hooded 20mm lugs on the case. Oh yes, it's titanium too, so it's a light as anything on the wrist. Inside is a Seiko 5M4x kinetic movement.