kevin_b1 wrote:DJ today




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lovely clear photo, you can really see the detail in the linen (?) face.

Hope your Rolex isn't feeling too hurt by all the anti-cyclops comments on a certain other thread

Aifo wrote:

That's a really interesting looking watch Aifo, plenty of complications so I guess very useful.

I had to laugh though at the "day" and "date" labels, just in case the user doesn't know what they were for

I can appreciate and even like a watch with a cyclops. I just couldn't buy another one

gaf1958 wrote:I can appreciate and even like a watch with a cyclops. I just couldn't buy another one

I agree Gary , I don't like cyclops either .

It's strange I am the total opposite if it's a Rolex with a date then it has to have a cyclops I looked at a Tudor day date which did not have a cyclops and for me that spoiled it completely.

But that is why we are all different and there are so many different types of watches on our wrists.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

to that!

gaf1958 wrote:I can appreciate and even like a watch with a cyclops. I just couldn't buy another one

Your eyes getting better with age ?

blowfish89 wrote:

gaf1958 wrote:I can appreciate and even like a watch with a cyclops. I just couldn't buy another one

Your eyes getting better with age ?

Better reading glasses

That's another good reason for the cyclops

Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk

It'sAliveJim wrote:

Better than the sub.

Tyneham on recently acquired Super Oyster



Bracelet tapers from 22mm lugs to 18mm, with the clasp being 20mm. Very good proportions that suit the Tyneham well.



Guy

Sent from my Xperia Z5 Premium

kevin_b1 wrote:That's another good reason for the cyclops

Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk

The date window on my wife's Tudor is so small it took her about 6 months to realise there was a date window. She has since claimed my DJ as hers and thinks the cyclops is a marvellous invention!

Neil