nbg wrote:That looks like a sensible sized conventional looking Graham Graham . Or should that be an unconventional looking Graham, as it looks totally different and better than their normal stuff. 42mm case size?

Neil

tempusmaximus wrote:That has to be the only Graham I like Graham , very nice mate

Thanks Neil, Thanks Bernie.

I have wanted one of these Silverstones for a long time now and the 41.9mm is perfect for me, the AR coating inside and out is fantastic. Really don,t like any of their other oversized stuff with the stupid crown guards.

blowfish89 wrote:

Happy new year!

Happy new year Om - one of my favourite Submariners on the forum . Bezel looks a bit out though!

Neil

It'sAliveJim wrote:Happy New Year CWF

That looks great is it 38mm or 42mm?

I think this is 38mm. I owned one and its a great watch.

footycrazy wrote:

Didn't know you'd branched out into watchmaking mate...
See, mine was a little more subtle Didn't once mention your or the watches name.
Looks good; if only all their watches were a bit more restrained there'd be a few more of them around I think.

Old pic but this combo today

neil8fletcher3 wrote:

It'sAliveJim wrote:Happy New Year CWF

That looks great is it 38mm or 42mm?

It's 38mm. You can tell by the hour hand hitting the minute track. The hand falls short on the 42mm version:

Rolex Oysterdate today




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

sent from my LV using Gucci

A canny bag of Tudor


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Guy

Sent from my Xperia Z5 Premium

^^^Gorgeous GS , Greg , the dial is just stunning

Bahnstormer_vRS wrote:

Guy

Looks great Guy
So tempting...so very tempting