Amor Vincit Omnia wrote:I had forgotten that! Well, it has already worked OK for me this year!downer wrote:...I followed AVO's rule #11 (chuck out the rules and go with your gut).
Now that's a rule i always use .
Amor Vincit Omnia wrote:I had forgotten that! Well, it has already worked OK for me this year!downer wrote:...I followed AVO's rule #11 (chuck out the rules and go with your gut).
Thanks, Jack. It was thanks to your comment that I managed to grab it, so if I keep it, It's down to you.jack wrote:Nice, I hope you like it, I was wondering what you'd gone for. It is a handsome dial, no doubt about it. It pulls off the difficult balance between different from the herd but still good looking to my mind.
Cheers WS. I think you are right about the in-house movement. As you know, I am a fan of Bremont, and I think the quality level is pretty high - but there is no doubt the prices are also high, and the equation would probably be more comfortable with an in-house movement - even if the prices increased.watchstudent wrote:Nice one Richard, supermarine is an underrated watch imo. Superb original design with fantastic functionality and "toughness", if there was an in house movement in it i think it would be much more popular. Hope you get one with this one.
Well thanks to the fact that the minute markers have been replaced with a 24 hour scale, the TN version seems less afflicted.blowfish89 wrote:I do like the colors on this watch, and it looks pretty great overall, though it has my pet hate about minute marker orientation inversion.
I guess we can argue about bezel numeral orientation all day long - although I think the outer bezel is "correct" and the chapter ring is arguably "incorrect"blowfish89 wrote:Meh, that bezel would drive me nuts. Atleast, you'll always know where East and West are, in 30 degree increments (once you've oriented the North properly)
Inversion in chapter ring + inversion in bezel.. no lume on bezel.. send it back