smegwina wrote: [/url]

Suspiciously close to CW Towers there Smegwina!

FloridaPhil wrote:

smegwina wrote: [/url]

Suspiciously close to CW Towers there Smegwina!

Indeed we were! Alas, no possibility of a visit. Wifey had us running late for the restaurant and the traffic was shocking.

The photo is the result of her trying to prove that our tardiness was the result of traffic (showing time and position)as opposed to her taking nine hrs to get ready.



Sent from my IRON using Tapatalk

smegwina wrote:

What am I supposed to be looking at here?

I'm pretty sure that it's a Breitling clock.

scooter

OK, I'm clearly missing something here...

...I'll get my coat...


Sent from my GuyPhone using ****

poppydoodlesdad wrote:OK, I'm clearly missing something here...

...I'll get my coat...


Sent from my GuyPhone using ****

It was in answer to the comment with regards to the link between Breitling and Bentley.



Sent from my IRON using Tapatalk

I'm assuming then that this is your Bentley? (very nice!).
Do Breitling actually make the clock or do Bentley just slap a 'Breitling' on the dial?
And can you hear it tick?


Sent from my GuyPhone using ****

poppydoodlesdad wrote:I'm assuming then that this is your Bentley? (very nice!).
Do Breitling actually make the clock or do Bentley just slap a 'Breitling' on the dial?
And can you hear it tick?


Sent from my GuyPhone using ****

Alas, the car has been replaced by one that is much cheaper to run.

I suspect that it is the name slapped on the clock on the older models (that car was 10 yrs old), although some newer models do indeed have removable "genuine" clocks.

Sent from my IRON using Tapatalk

smegwina wrote:[(that car was 10 yrs old), although some newer models do indeed have removable "genuine" clocks.

Only 10 yrs old....? the hardship of it all.....