Why all the negativity towards CW?

Discuss Christopher Ward watches
ralfybaby
Senior
Senior
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2021 2:54 am

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by ralfybaby »

Yeh I saw that thread also and posted on it. (Dolle Dolf).
People are so image and label conscious that the forego a good value when they see one
Although I prefer the shall we say "old esthetics" of the CW brand they still make a terrific watch for the money.
Dilbert
Senior
Senior
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2019 4:51 pm

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by Dilbert »

ralfybaby wrote: Thu Apr 27, 2023 8:23 pm Yeh I saw that thread also and posted on it. (Dolle Dolf).
People are so image and label conscious
Some of the people on that thread seem more conscious of the label than the product’s quality.

Although I reckon CW’s brand equity is rising, catalysed by high-quality products and innovation.
User avatar
golfjunky
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 6842
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:32 pm
Location: Essex

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by golfjunky »

Prior to the 12 and the BC I actually thought CW was doing great at staying away from the reputation of just creating homages.
Current collection = Omega Seamaster 2225.80.00, Omega Speedmaster 'Moonphase' 3576.50.00, Breitling Aerospace Evo, Vintage Azur, Vintage Seiko Sprtsman, Grand Seiko SBGX059, Omega SMP NTTD 210.92.42.20.01.001, Casioak Milkyway, Casioak Tiffany Sky.
User avatar
nbg
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 13151
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2013 6:43 pm
CW-watches: 14
Location: UK

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by nbg »

golfjunky wrote: Fri Apr 28, 2023 8:26 am Prior to the 12 and the BC I actually thought CW was doing great at staying away from the reputation of just creating homages.
Greg mate I award you 6/10 for low level trolling…. :lol:

You know you will get pushback with that type of talk. :wink:

It is rather weird that CW seem to attract a high number of folk with bunker mentality when folk criticise the brand. There are even mild mannered upstanding folk who become attack dogs if someone has a go at CW. :problem:

If someone has a go about any of my favourite brands, I just look at the watch I am wearing, whether JLC or CW and the four others in between and chuckle to myself and think “whatever”. :D

Neil
These users thanked the author nbg for the post:
golfjunky
Other watch forums of interest:
TZ-UK
User avatar
golfjunky
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 6842
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:32 pm
Location: Essex

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by golfjunky »

nbg wrote: Fri Apr 28, 2023 8:46 am
golfjunky wrote: Fri Apr 28, 2023 8:26 am Prior to the 12 and the BC I actually thought CW was doing great at staying away from the reputation of just creating homages.
Greg mate I award you 6/10 for low level trolling…. :lol:

You know you will get pushback with that type of talk. :wink:

It is rather weird that CW seem to attract a high number of folk with bunker mentality when folk criticise the brand. There are even mild mannered upstanding folk who become attack dogs if someone has a go at CW. :problem:

If someone has a go about any of my favourite brands, I just look at the watch I am wearing, whether JLC or CW and the four others in between and chuckle to myself and think “whatever”. :D

Neil
Haha, I mean it. i really liked the Sealander (yes the GMT was a EXP2 copy) it even made me a customer again. The leopard and blue C63 are lovely looking watches and the evolution of the Trident away from the sub has been great. The moonglow and others have all been nice CW watches and not ones that i have thought are copies of others.

I love a healthy bout of ding dong between us casuals and the fanboys.

Im with you on the weird folk that get tribal
Current collection = Omega Seamaster 2225.80.00, Omega Speedmaster 'Moonphase' 3576.50.00, Breitling Aerospace Evo, Vintage Azur, Vintage Seiko Sprtsman, Grand Seiko SBGX059, Omega SMP NTTD 210.92.42.20.01.001, Casioak Milkyway, Casioak Tiffany Sky.
User avatar
Amor Vincit Omnia
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 33796
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 7:34 pm
CW-watches: 4
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by Amor Vincit Omnia »

nbg wrote: Fri Apr 28, 2023 8:46 am It is rather weird that CW seem to attract a high number of folk with bunker mentality when folk criticise the brand. There are even mild mannered upstanding folk who become attack dogs if someone has a go at CW. :problem:
I’m trying to think of another watch brand that attracts a similar following. It slips my mind for the moment, but it will probably come back to me. :-k
Steve
Linguist; retired teacher; pilgrim; apprentice travel writer

Take nothing but pictures, leave nothing but footprints, kill nothing but time


Avoid loud and aggressive persons; they are vexatious to the spirit. (Max Ehrmann)
StrappedUp
Trusted Seller
Trusted Seller
Posts: 3168
Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 2:14 pm
CW-watches: 0
Location: South Wales

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by StrappedUp »

golfjunky wrote: Fri Apr 28, 2023 8:26 am Prior to the 12 and the BC I actually thought CW was doing great at staying away from the reputation of just creating homages.
Ouch! Shirley you can't been seeing any homage in the Bel Canto G? Okay, you got a nibble. :lol:

Can't disagree on the 12 however. I like it, but after my initial excitement died down, only the price is keeping me (vaguely) interested, and that's not enough anymore. Just another integrated bracelet watch, probably because it's been released a few years too late.
Ryan
User avatar
golfjunky
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 6842
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:32 pm
Location: Essex

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by golfjunky »

StrappedUp wrote: Fri Apr 28, 2023 9:17 am
golfjunky wrote: Fri Apr 28, 2023 8:26 am Prior to the 12 and the BC I actually thought CW was doing great at staying away from the reputation of just creating homages.
Ouch! Shirley you can't been seeing any homage in the Bel Canto G? Okay, you got a nibble. :lol:

Can't disagree on the 12 however. I like it, but after my initial excitement died down, only the price is keeping me (vaguely) interested, and that's not enough anymore. Just another integrated bracelet watch, probably because it's been released a few years too late.
Who are you calling Shirley! :lol: BC = MB&F LM2. the only difference i see with them is that you can actually tell the time with the MB&F 8)

I like the 12 too and am similar to you that with a sleep and some reading my enthusiasm has dwindled slightly. saying that i still might.
These users thanked the author golfjunky for the post (total 2):
StrappedUpalbionphoto
Current collection = Omega Seamaster 2225.80.00, Omega Speedmaster 'Moonphase' 3576.50.00, Breitling Aerospace Evo, Vintage Azur, Vintage Seiko Sprtsman, Grand Seiko SBGX059, Omega SMP NTTD 210.92.42.20.01.001, Casioak Milkyway, Casioak Tiffany Sky.
User avatar
iain
Trusted Seller
Trusted Seller
Posts: 3115
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 3:13 pm
CW-watches: 1

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by iain »

If you want bunker mentality and not accepting any criticism of the brand at all, you want to head to the Zelos pages on Facebook. I’m sure they have a large wicker man somewhere to house the non believers.
Iain’s Law: Any discussion on the Christopher Ward forum, irrespective of the thread title or subject matter, will eventually lead to someone mentioning the Bel Canto if the thread continues for long enough.
User avatar
Kip
The Administrator
The Administrator
Posts: 35174
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:45 pm
CW-watches: 150
LE-one: yes
LE-two: yes
LE-three: yes
LE-foura: yes
LE-fourb: yes
LE-five: yes
LE-six: yes
LESeven: yes
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by Kip »

golfjunky wrote: Fri Apr 28, 2023 9:03 am
Haha, I mean it. i really liked the Sealander (yes the GMT was a EXP2 copy) it even made me a customer again.
I just had a good look at the Rolex Explorer II GMT and see what you mean.

Aside from the hand set, indices, date position, cyclops, case size, bracelet style, thickness of bezel numbers, crown guards, print font and logo, they look identical!!

I think the black/white dials and orange GMT hand are the real giveaways. :lol:

Seriously though, At a quick glance, and true differences aside, The C63 GMT does bear a resemblance.
These users thanked the author Kip for the post (total 3):
golfjunkyOllyWalbionphoto
Kip

"Asylum Administrator"


Visit the CWArchives for everything CW. Historical, specs, manuals and resale. It is all there.
User avatar
golfjunky
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 6842
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:32 pm
Location: Essex

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by golfjunky »

I appreciate your responding as above.

One of the bad things about the internet is that once its out there it will always be there. As much as i hope CW can plough their own path things like the below are still all too common for CW.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XecQGDxa1Uw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDDX7xnIBhc
Current collection = Omega Seamaster 2225.80.00, Omega Speedmaster 'Moonphase' 3576.50.00, Breitling Aerospace Evo, Vintage Azur, Vintage Seiko Sprtsman, Grand Seiko SBGX059, Omega SMP NTTD 210.92.42.20.01.001, Casioak Milkyway, Casioak Tiffany Sky.
User avatar
Bahnstormer_vRS
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 35165
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:06 pm
CW-watches: 34
LE-three: 1
LE-foura: 1
LE-fourb: 1
LE-six: 1
Location: Hertfordshire, UK

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by Bahnstormer_vRS »

@golfjunky
golfjunky wrote: Fri Apr 28, 2023 9:03 am
Haha, I mean it. i really liked the Sealander (yes the GMT was a EXP2 copy) it even made me a customer again.
Okay Greg.

Let's keep it simple and, as is said 'a picture paints a thousand words'.

You believe one of theses watches is a copy of the other.

Image

Photo by @ItsAliveJim


Image

Photo by @Internaut


I think I need to go to Specsavers. :shock: :shock:

Guy



Sent from my XPERIA 5 III using Tapatalk
These users thanked the author Bahnstormer_vRS for the post:
ste007db
In small proportions, we just beautie see:
And in short measures, life may perfect bee. - Ben Jonson (1572 – 1637)

Inscription on the Longitude Dial
Hatfield House, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 5NB, England
User avatar
golfjunky
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 6842
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:32 pm
Location: Essex

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by golfjunky »

Ok, I'll play your game but i'll compare apples with apples.
cwexp.png
Current collection = Omega Seamaster 2225.80.00, Omega Speedmaster 'Moonphase' 3576.50.00, Breitling Aerospace Evo, Vintage Azur, Vintage Seiko Sprtsman, Grand Seiko SBGX059, Omega SMP NTTD 210.92.42.20.01.001, Casioak Milkyway, Casioak Tiffany Sky.
triffidman
Guru
Guru
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:43 pm
CW-watches: 2
Location: Buckinghamshire

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by triffidman »

Emphasis wrote: Thu Apr 13, 2023 9:34 pm
I'm curious, what were your bad experiences?

One of my own biggest criticisms is product longevity and parts availability long-term. Although Christopher Ward seems to have taken steps towards improving in that regard. It's still a relatively young brand, and overall I do like the direction CW is heading.
My last 3 purchases, some years back now were as follows:

- C60 Orange face - arrived with a 'ding' on the underside of the lug, and the wrong manual. £100 discount offered for the ding (which seemed a nice gesture), but it took over 2 months and umpteen frustrating phone calls and e-mails to get both the correct manual sent to me and that partial refund.

- C70 Ascari. Ordered 2 (they were on at a good price), only 1 was sent but I was charged for the 2 I ordered. I phoned and spoke to somebody who said something along the lines of "Yes, I think we run out of those"...I then had to raise the point that they'd charged me for 2, which then took several phones call (by myself) to finally get the refund organised. They were not pro-active at all, and failed many times to return my calls and keep their promise that they would call me back.

- Cxx (like the Morgan chronograph, but without the Morgan logo - can't remember the actual model number). They sent the wrong watch head, but was oddly on the correct strap - in a head/strap combination they don't even sell. After raising it with them and desperately trying to get them to see sense and correct the issue, they claimed that I had simply ordered the wrong one and needed to send it back and order the right one. Even though they had technically sold me a watch design (i.e. head+strap) that isn't on their website. After several frustrating attempts to get them to admit it was wrong, I gave up and just got a refund - they were blinkered in their view that the correct watch HAD been sent.

The customer service on all of the above experiences was severely below par, slow, frustrating, and generally gave the impression that they had no clue what they were doing. It completely turned me off the brand altogether. Then Mike France appeared to increase the marketing waffle and numerical hyperbole* that now emanates from their PR marketing machine, and it just makes me cringe and glad that I said goodbye.


(*one such example is where Mike France said something like "their sales during the first year of Coronavirus were 800% more than they expected" - what exactly does that mean?!?!?!. Ok then, they expected to sell 1 watch, and they actually sold 9?)
These users thanked the author triffidman for the post:
rc51owner
C60 GMT (SOKKO)
C40 Chronograph

Laco Helsinki
Tissot T Touch Expert

Casio G-Shock Frogman
Casio G-Shock GPW-1000
User avatar
golfjunky
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 6842
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 7:32 pm
Location: Essex

Re: Why all the negativity towards CW?

Post by golfjunky »

Yes to us geeks there is a number of differences but i know that Joe blogs from across the bar would think im either wearing a bad fake Rolex or even worse a Copy of a Rolex.
Current collection = Omega Seamaster 2225.80.00, Omega Speedmaster 'Moonphase' 3576.50.00, Breitling Aerospace Evo, Vintage Azur, Vintage Seiko Sprtsman, Grand Seiko SBGX059, Omega SMP NTTD 210.92.42.20.01.001, Casioak Milkyway, Casioak Tiffany Sky.