Price Increase
-
- Senior
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 4:08 am
- CW-watches: 2
- Location: new york, ny
Re: Price Increase
My point is not that prices are naturally rising. My point is that cw at full retail price is not necessarily a good value compared with similarly featured watches from other brands.
This is meaningful because cw promotes itself as a value brand.
This is meaningful because cw promotes itself as a value brand.
Re: Price Increase
But no longer at a fraction of the price of Tissot or Hamilton.Nicky J wrote:I still think that CW are good value for money. Using the same Sellita SW200 / ETA movements as Tag, Christian Dior at a fraction of the price - CW gets my vote:-)
The excellent CW customer service (including the truly exceptional 5-year warrany with the even more exceptional payment of international shipping both ways on repairs) has to be factored in, however, and still makes the lower-priced CWs a very good value.
- Mortis
- Forum Menace
- Posts: 2932
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:48 pm
- CW-watches: 12
- LE-two: yes
- LE-three: yes
- Location: Surrey
Re: Price Increase
Increasingly CWL are moving away from the "value" bracket.
My first was a C8 at circa £250 four years ago. That watch would now set me back £400. This pricing means that CWL are more expensive than competitors such as Hamilton and Tissot, as well as small brands like Steinhart and Timefactors.
Can the expense be justified? Maybe. I would expect a 15% discount* from a new CWL, which would make it much more sensible, so maybe they are priced with the expectation of most sales being at a discount. Furthermore, the NN sales and similar still make the brand retail in the "good value" category.
However, I suspect that in the next five years brands will have to either buy movements from someone other than Swatch (and the Swiss stuff will go to the big boys so that means China) or make their own. The C900 is clearly an indication, alongside the increased prices, that CWL will be moving into the new movement arena (albeit a movement that a number of, presumably independent, brands will share).
They shift 15-20k watches per year, so whatever they do it is working.
* I do wish the other half had consulted me before going "all in" on a Monopusher!
My first was a C8 at circa £250 four years ago. That watch would now set me back £400. This pricing means that CWL are more expensive than competitors such as Hamilton and Tissot, as well as small brands like Steinhart and Timefactors.
Can the expense be justified? Maybe. I would expect a 15% discount* from a new CWL, which would make it much more sensible, so maybe they are priced with the expectation of most sales being at a discount. Furthermore, the NN sales and similar still make the brand retail in the "good value" category.
However, I suspect that in the next five years brands will have to either buy movements from someone other than Swatch (and the Swiss stuff will go to the big boys so that means China) or make their own. The C900 is clearly an indication, alongside the increased prices, that CWL will be moving into the new movement arena (albeit a movement that a number of, presumably independent, brands will share).
They shift 15-20k watches per year, so whatever they do it is working.
* I do wish the other half had consulted me before going "all in" on a Monopusher!
- welshlad
- Moderator
- Posts: 11301
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:33 am
- CW-watches: 27
- Location: Yorkshire, UK
Re: Price Increase
Ah, but that would have ruined what must have been the most fantastic surprise. Think of the missed 15% discount as the cost of love!Mortis wrote:* I do wish the other half had consulted me before going "all in" on a Monopusher!
Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future. - Niels Bohr
- mabotham
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:10 am
- CW-watches: 5
- LE-two: yes
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Price Increase
The prices do seem to have jumped up.
I wouldnt buy at full price knowing they do a 10% discount and NN watches regularly.
Also, watches for sale from other members offer a good discount & are usually in perfect condition.
Saying that, I was willing to pay full price for the Makaira Elite; but then a discount code was posted so I used that. Bonus.
I wouldnt buy at full price knowing they do a 10% discount and NN watches regularly.
Also, watches for sale from other members offer a good discount & are usually in perfect condition.
Saying that, I was willing to pay full price for the Makaira Elite; but then a discount code was posted so I used that. Bonus.
- Kansas City Milkman
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 2520
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:08 pm
- CW-watches: 14
- Location: Surrey
Re: Price Increase
Interestingly the recent survey didn't seek CW comparison against Tissot and Hamilton, maintaining a focus on some other brands such as Omega amongst others. I was surprised as I'd see these in competition with CW in certain watch sectors.Avo wrote:But no longer at a fraction of the price of Tissot or Hamilton.Nicky J wrote:I still think that CW are good value for money. Using the same Sellita SW200 / ETA movements as Tag, Christian Dior at a fraction of the price - CW gets my vote:-)
The excellent CW customer service (including the truly exceptional 5-year warrany with the even more exceptional payment of international shipping both ways on repairs) has to be factored in, however, and still makes the lower-priced CWs a very good value.
That said clearly the brand has aspirations and I'd see CW moving away from the value angle but always maintaining a cost advantage over more expensive brands.
Re: Price Increase
I have probably mentioned it before - but value doesn't have to mean cheap - if the CWL philosophy of quality at a reasonable price (i.e. without sky-high markups due to advertising / sponsorship / etc.) then that allows them to play at any (or indeed many!) price levels...
so moving up to higher price levels isn't necessarily indicative of losing value - but about how they pitch their brand - it can still allow them to offer value within that price level...
Alasdair
so moving up to higher price levels isn't necessarily indicative of losing value - but about how they pitch their brand - it can still allow them to offer value within that price level...
Alasdair
Tracking Christopher Ward watch prices on ebay globally at Watchroll
Tracking Bremont watch prices on ebay globally at Watchtrace
Tracking Bremont watch prices on ebay globally at Watchtrace
- Kansas City Milkman
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 2520
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:08 pm
- CW-watches: 14
- Location: Surrey
Re: Price Increase
Very true. I guess when you look at the high quality of CW against more expensive brands 'good value' will undoubtedly be linked to relative price and therefore cost.akirk wrote:I have probably mentioned it before - but value doesn't have to mean cheap - if the CWL philosophy of quality at a reasonable price (i.e. without sky-high markups due to advertising / sponsorship / etc.) then that allows them to play at any (or indeed many!) price levels...
so moving up to higher price levels isn't necessarily indicative of losing value - but about how they pitch their brand - it can still allow them to offer value within that price level...
Alasdair
I do agree that CW can still represent value at a higher price point and my view is that is where the brand is heading.
Re: Price Increase
I am sure that they are - it is a simple move to increase profit marginsKansas city milkman wrote:Very true. I guess when you look at the high quality of CW against more expensive brands 'good value' will undoubtedly be linked to relative price and therefore cost.akirk wrote:I have probably mentioned it before - but value doesn't have to mean cheap - if the CWL philosophy of quality at a reasonable price (i.e. without sky-high markups due to advertising / sponsorship / etc.) then that allows them to play at any (or indeed many!) price levels...
so moving up to higher price levels isn't necessarily indicative of losing value - but about how they pitch their brand - it can still allow them to offer value within that price level...
Alasdair
I do agree that CW can still represent value at a higher price point and my view is that is where the brand is heading.
Alasdair
Tracking Christopher Ward watch prices on ebay globally at Watchroll
Tracking Bremont watch prices on ebay globally at Watchtrace
Tracking Bremont watch prices on ebay globally at Watchtrace
- poppydoodlesdad
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 10:27 pm
- Location: Nowhere, man
Re: Price Increase
Maybe, but even these numbers don't come close to the likes of Rolex, Omega etc so, like (relatively) low volume manufactures in other industries, cars for instance, it may be that CW is having / wanting to increase its margins. To justify the higher price point though it has to produce more 'exclusive' models and be seen to be in the 'high end' arena?Mortis wrote:Increasingly CWL are moving away from the "value" bracket.
They shift 15-20k watches per year, so whatever they do it is working.
Just an idea......
"You can get help from teachers, but you are going to have to learn a lot by yourself, sitting alone in a room." Dr. Seuss
Some watches
Some watches
Re: Price Increase
it is also good to have a progression of watches / price points so that they can get people in from all ages / wealth points and then if coming in with the cheaper watches - take them up the price brackets as they can afford more...
CWL is still a very young company
Alasdair
CWL is still a very young company
Alasdair
Tracking Christopher Ward watch prices on ebay globally at Watchroll
Tracking Bremont watch prices on ebay globally at Watchtrace
Tracking Bremont watch prices on ebay globally at Watchtrace
- borderman
- Trusted Seller
- Posts: 1191
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:43 pm
- CW-watches: 7
- Location: Staffs
Re: Price Increase
Nicky J wrote:I still think that CW are good value for money. Using the same Sellita SW200 / ETA movements as Tag, Christian Dior at a fraction of the price - CW gets my vote:-)
+ one
Dave
3 CW ladies for my wife.
Re: Price Increase
When CW debuted in 2005, they were selling a watch with a Swiss mechanical movement for £99, a fantastic price. Today, eight years later, essentially the same watch costs three times as much. Yes, I know there are various out-of-CW's-control reasons for that, but still it's a striking loss of value.
I have no interest whatsoever in "brand positioning". I care about the object I receive for the money I pay, and not what anyone else thinks about it. By that standard, CW is far less of a value today than it was eight years ago.
I have no interest whatsoever in "brand positioning". I care about the object I receive for the money I pay, and not what anyone else thinks about it. By that standard, CW is far less of a value today than it was eight years ago.
- welshlad
- Moderator
- Posts: 11301
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:33 am
- CW-watches: 27
- Location: Yorkshire, UK
Re: Price Increase
Fair enough, but no-one ever paid £99 for the C5. The £99 was a trial offering alongside two higher price experiments, to test out where the demand curve was. Chris has stated that no-one took up the £99 price because they perceived that the watch must be poor quality to be available at that price. So it's not a fair statement to say that the price has tripled since 2005.Avo wrote:When CW debuted in 2005, they were selling a watch with a Swiss mechanical movement for £99, a fantastic price. Today, eight years later, essentially the same watch costs three times as much. Yes, I know there are various out-of-CW's-control reasons for that, but still it's a striking loss of value.
I have no interest whatsoever in "brand positioning". I care about the object I receive for the money I pay, and not what anyone else thinks about it. By that standard, CW is far less of a value today than it was eight years ago.
I still think the C5 and most of the CWL range represents pretty good value for money for the quality on offer. Sure, there are other competitors with similar value for money, but CWL is still on the whole a very attractive brand proposition.
Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future. - Niels Bohr
Re: Price Increase
I was going by the famous TimeZone review by David Malone, posted on 25 November 2005 (link available from the CW online reviews page). In the review, Mr. Malone says that he paid for the watch ("exchanging emails with Chris Ward before buying the watch was a pleasure"), and that the price in the UK is £99. So at least one person paid this price.welshlad wrote:Fair enough, but no-one ever paid £99 for the C5. The £99 was a trial offering alongside two higher price experiments, to test out where the demand curve was. Chris has stated that no-one took up the £99 price because they perceived that the watch must be poor quality to be available at that price. So it's not a fair statement to say that the price has tripled since 2005.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 10 Replies
- 684 Views
-
Last post by willttqs
-
- 13 Replies
- 636 Views
-
Last post by MikeyT100
-
- 3 Replies
- 332 Views
-
Last post by goodbarista
-
- 9 Replies
- 405 Views
-
Last post by MistaFroggyG