Poorly C65 trident diver

Discuss Christopher Ward watches
User avatar
missF
CW Forum Poet Laureate
CW Forum Poet Laureate
Posts: 12706
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 2:59 pm
CW-watches: 1
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by missF »

^^^ I’ve contacted the seller and contacted CW. There was a little bit of back and forward with CW to get the watch ownership transferred to my name as I didn’t have the original order number (nor did the seller) and they couldn’t trace the serial number from the warranty card. But they sent me a return pack anyway and the watch is on the way back to CW. I’m waiting now to hear if the repair will be done under warranty.

I got the impression that CW want to have all my CW watches on the system/ on my file. Not sure if that has always been the way of things as I’ve never needed CS for much in the past. I’ll need to remember to transfer ownership of any other CW watches I buy second hand
JAFO
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 5945
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 3:59 pm

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by JAFO »

I didn't know there was a formal ownership record. I've bought preowned CWs and never thought to do anything like that. Mind you I do have warranty cards for them.
These users thanked the author JAFO for the post:
tikkathree
thomcat00
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 2196
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2021 9:14 am
CW-watches: 15
Location: FLX, NY, USA

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by thomcat00 »

I hope all goes well with the repair; the khaki is an unusual dial color. I very much enjoy my C65 manual watch.

It puzzles me that the CW records require order numbers to locate watch details when the model and serial number info is available. Thirty years ago databases for sales data were easily searchable, even DOS based.
with Kung Fu grip, and life-like hair
User avatar
missF
CW Forum Poet Laureate
CW Forum Poet Laureate
Posts: 12706
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 2:59 pm
CW-watches: 1
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by missF »

I wonder if CW are now trying to catch up and get things in order that hadn’t been well recorded in the past? I know from posts here that serial numbers had really been quite a random and meaningless affair up to a certain point! Someone will correct me if I’m wrong on this, or have some more details.

Anyway @thomcat00 - I agree that the khaki is an interesting take on the C65 diver, and I was most interested in owning a hand wound watch. Until the hand winding failed! :roll:
These users thanked the author missF for the post:
tikkathree
User avatar
tikkathree
Trusted Seller
Trusted Seller
Posts: 8770
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:21 am
CW-watches: 1
Location: East Anglia - arr 'aas right buh

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by tikkathree »

missF wrote: Tue Aug 22, 2023 7:31 pm ^^^ I’ve contacted the seller and contacted CW. There was a little bit of back and forward with CW to get the watch ownership transferred to my name as I didn’t have the original order number (nor did the seller) and they couldn’t trace the serial number from the warranty card. But they sent me a return pack anyway and the watch is on the way back to CW. I’m waiting now to hear if the repair will be done under warranty.

I got the impression that CW want to have all my CW watches on the system/ on my file. Not sure if that has always been the way of things as I’ve never needed CS for much in the past. I’ll need to remember to transfer ownership of any other CW watches I buy second hand
Why is it that I spend too much time, purely for lack of any evidence to the contrary, with the notion that CW regard themselves as purveyors of new watches with all the attendant growth in market penetration, model refreshment & review just so we don't get stuck with just our favourite model.

Why do I get a feeling that CW really would rather not have to deal with service/repairs/maintenance issues? I say with full certainty that if I wasn't so heavily invested in being a brand fanboy I could be discouraged enough to sell up and walk away?

@missF I really do hope that CW Customer Service give you much better than average service in fettling your watch and returning it to proper functionality: much better service and a better experience. I hope you get your watch back before November.

I can't see how "let's build a database of owners when our own sales records don't give us the basic tools" is going to improve the ongoing customer service experience.

@missF I should apologise for using your thread to have a rant.

@missF coming back to the EBay transaction and seller if there's anywhere in all of this that you might end up going back to the seller for a refund in full or in part I would encourage you to 1. not leave feedback, 2. raise a complaint and fully document what you and the seller have agreed thus far and 3. If you've paid using a card or paypal or some other means which offers you "buyer protection" you should log the issue with them before the time window for doing so closes.
C60 MKI, MKII, MKIII: "some",
C6 & C60 Kingfishers,
C600 Tritechs,
C63 "some",
C65 "some",
C4, C40, C8, C9, C3, C5, C20 & 23FLE
Some other brands
User avatar
missF
CW Forum Poet Laureate
CW Forum Poet Laureate
Posts: 12706
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 2:59 pm
CW-watches: 1
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by missF »

tikkathree wrote: Wed Aug 23, 2023 8:06 am @missF I should apologise for using your thread to have a rant.
No worries Pete :thumbup:
I have to say I’m doing a lot of surmising here and I don’t want to do CW down unfairly. CS have dealt with the issue and the watch is away for inspection. I do take your points though. CW are building, designing selling great watches according to the aims they set out from the beginning, but are maybe playing catch-up with the things that happen after they’ve sold a watch. But I’ve never had any problems with CS so can’t really comment further. I mentioned the transfer of ownership and the feeling that they were trying to build a full dataset of the watches I own just to see if anyone had any more info on this :thumbup:
These users thanked the author missF for the post:
tikkathree
Trs1982
Senior Guru
Senior Guru
Posts: 417
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2022 4:15 pm

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by Trs1982 »

Good luck with the inspection process. Fingers crossed that it is accepted for repair under warranty. Have you agreed anything with the seller in the event that it may be chargeable?
User avatar
missF
CW Forum Poet Laureate
CW Forum Poet Laureate
Posts: 12706
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 2:59 pm
CW-watches: 1
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by missF »

Trs1982 wrote: Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:23 am Good luck with the inspection process. Fingers crossed that it is accepted for repair under warranty. Have you agreed anything with the seller in the event that it may be chargeable?
No - haven’t agreed anything with the seller. I probably should, but I don’t want to get into any unhappiness with anyone based on a situation that hasn’t arisen yet... If I didn’t like the watch so much I think I’d deal with it differently :D
These users thanked the author missF for the post:
Trs1982
DavidCM
Expert
Expert
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat May 27, 2023 1:10 pm

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by DavidCM »

To protect your position,you really must put the seller and eBay on notice of the problem.Hopefully the matter will get resolved satisfactorily in the meantime,without any problems.
These users thanked the author DavidCM for the post (total 2):
missFtikkathree
User avatar
MiniMpi
Trusted Seller
Trusted Seller
Posts: 38092
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:56 am
CW-watches: 11
Location: Cork, Ireland

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by MiniMpi »

Sorry to hear about this Lindsey :)

The Khaki C65 Handwind is a great watch, I've had the black dial before and the yellow LE currently.
It's a lovely movement so hopefully nothing major but potentially could be the mainspring going by the symptoms.

I would just note it with eBay that you are getting it assessed for warranty but if it's not covered that you'd have to get a partial refund.

Regarding needing the order number, I came across this before but normally only if there was no warranty card present.

I hope it all works out well for you ;)
These users thanked the author MiniMpi for the post (total 2):
missFtikkathree
JAFO
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 5945
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 3:59 pm

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by JAFO »

missF wrote: Tue Aug 22, 2023 7:31 pm ^^^ I’ve contacted the seller and contacted CW. There was a little bit of back and forward with CW to get the watch ownership transferred to my name as I didn’t have the original order number (nor did the seller) and they couldn’t trace the serial number from the warranty card. But they sent me a return pack anyway and the watch is on the way back to CW. I’m waiting now to hear if the repair will be done under warranty.

I got the impression that CW want to have all my CW watches on the system/ on my file. Not sure if that has always been the way of things as I’ve never needed CS for much in the past. I’ll need to remember to transfer ownership of any other CW watches I buy second hand
With regard to serial numbers, and databases in general (speaking as a database developer), I actually can't see any way that manufacturers can trace serial numbers issued to customers without a lot of work. A small company such as CW might be able to, but in general I don't expect the manufacturer has any idea until a customer records his purchase, or has a warranty claim. (the way it works with white goods).
These users thanked the author JAFO for the post:
tikkathree
User avatar
rkovars
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4975
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2020 7:56 pm
CW-watches: 7
Location: New England, US

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by rkovars »

missF wrote: Tue Aug 22, 2023 7:31 pm ^^^ I’ve contacted the seller and contacted CW. There was a little bit of back and forward with CW to get the watch ownership transferred to my name as I didn’t have the original order number (nor did the seller) and they couldn’t trace the serial number from the warranty card. But they sent me a return pack anyway and the watch is on the way back to CW. I’m waiting now to hear if the repair will be done under warranty.

I got the impression that CW want to have all my CW watches on the system/ on my file. Not sure if that has always been the way of things as I’ve never needed CS for much in the past. I’ll need to remember to transfer ownership of any other CW watches I buy second hand
I sent in a CW under warranty just last year that I had purchased second hand and didn't have to go through any of this. I just needed to send a copy of the warranty card which I had as part of the sale. There was never a mention of transfer of ownership or anything. This seems new.
These users thanked the author rkovars for the post:
tikkathree
Life is not a matter of holding good cards, but sometimes, playing a poor hand well.
Jack London
User avatar
ajax87
Senior Forumgod
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 4036
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 2:47 am
CW-watches: 7
Location: West Michigan, USA

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by ajax87 »

The process does seem to have changed recently. I sent in a CW for repair in February of this year and didn't deal with any of that. I sent another one in last week and was required to fill out an online form which required an order number. I was the original purchaser, so I had that handy.
These users thanked the author ajax87 for the post:
tikkathree
Alex
C5A Mk1|C65 316L LE|C63 GMT, Elite, 2023ish FLE|C1 Moonglow|C12ti|Omega Seamaster DeVille|Speedmaster Racing|MoonSwatch Mercury|RZE Endeavor|Tudor BB54
User avatar
missF
CW Forum Poet Laureate
CW Forum Poet Laureate
Posts: 12706
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 2:59 pm
CW-watches: 1
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by missF »

ajax87 wrote: Wed Aug 23, 2023 6:23 pm ... and was required to fill out an online form which required an order number. I was the original purchaser, so I had that handy.
Yes. To fill in the online form you need the order number. Without this you can’t submit the form and are asked to contact CS.
MarkingTime
Senior Guru
Senior Guru
Posts: 784
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2017 7:19 pm
CW-watches: 4

Re: Poorly C65 trident diver

Post by MarkingTime »

missF wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 6:38 am This is the handwound version- Sellita SW210

I bought this from eBay and it arrived well packed yesterday. It set, hacked, wound and ran perfectly - for about eight hours (after a full wind). Then it stopped.

Now, it sets properly but when I try to wind it nothing happens. Winding the crown feels’empty’ - like it’s not catching on or driving anything.

I don’t have a problem with the seller - he has good history of selling good watches. I can’t return the watch. The watch is still under CW warranty.

I’m wondering if anyone has an idea what the problem might be? If this would be something that would be mended as a warranty repair? Whether it would be a straightforward repair for a local watchmaker to do.

Thanks for your thoughts :D


65E33EDC-D618-4F7B-85C1-797F40201EFB.jpeg
Rather than read all the replies (an answer is probably there) here is the situation.
1. If the watch is faulty you have the protection of the eBay money back guarantee, if still within the timeframe.
2 The watch is apparently faulty, if the watch is still under warranty, then the repair should be carried out free of charge, do not get hoodwinked into being told it needs a service by CW.
3. If you want to just get it fixed yourself, this is a generic and simple movement, well within the capabilities of any competent watchmaker and a cheap fix. I say cheap, it depends on what's actually gone wrong, but accessing the winding mechanism can be done without removing the movement from the watch, so I'd say £60-£80 at a guess. There's not much likely to have gone wrong.
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post