Except that is a nick name thought of by CW themselves.
Guy
Except that is a nick name thought of by CW themselves.
Accuracy wise, if it's mission critical, the Waveceptor I have will be the best bet. It keeps itself set against the NPL clock at Rugby, so close enough!Tonywalker wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2024 5:46 pmGood to hear they are sending out a coffin box for you.Chris GB wrote: ↑Wed Jun 19, 2024 11:25 pm Well it's back from warranty repair and the good news is that the auto winding sounds "better" than it did from new and a week on the wrist shows it to be working excellently.
That's the good bit. The watch was sent for repair in the original coffin box, but was returned to me in the new stubby box. Not great as that box won't fit the manual and additional strap packaging. CW have sent out a replacement coffin box, but it seems silly to make such a basic error.
More disappointing though is the watch went in with a return note stating that regulation was perfect. At +1spd I was really pleased with what I'd describe as optimal running. Following repair, that superb accuracy seems to have suffered. Given that they are only supposed to have replaced the auto winding mechanism, the watch now runs at -2spd. Beat error is now 0.4ms, up from 0.2. Sure it's still within tolerance, but it's not as good as it was. Is it even the same movement I wonder? Did someone take it upon themselves to dismantle and service it - a poor call if it was running so perfectly.
So while I'm happy that the turnaround was reasonably quick, the customer focus seems to have been a bit lacking. The watch is running within tolerance, but has gone from impressing to disappointing because of the loss of performance.
I know CW can offer great value, but I feel there to be just a bit too much disappointment in the mix. Maybe I've been unlucky? I was looking forward to the release of their next mechanical chronograph, but I'm struggling with the idea of buying another CW and seriously considering cancelling my BC order.
With regards to the accuracy, I personally feel you may be splitting hairs and doing CW a disservice - the watch will likely have been thrown around a lot during transit, which has likely caused the difference.
I used to work for a vehicle hire firm. It was shocking to witness a courier throwing parcels from the back of one van to the other, when switching over to a new van. Goes to show that the 'Fragile' tape isn't given a second thought by somebody who is simply in a rush to get from A to B as fast as possible.
I buy/sell many CW watches. I wear a new arrival and so long as it is still within reasonable timing by the end of the day, I am generally happy.
I have a few quartz watches if I need to be assured of accuracy every time.
Perhaps, as you hinted, manual/autos aren't the best option if every second counts for you.
I hope you come to live with the accuracy and enjoy wearing your watch
From experience, if you are handwriting an SH21, it takes approximately 20 'winds' per one day's PR to wind up.Masterwoodsman wrote:With mechanical movements I was always told from stopped give it a shake to get movement going then about 10-12 turns to put some change into it. I have a watch with the in house SH21 movement and wanted to fully charge the power reserve. I got to halfway after what felt like about 20 turns and didn't feel comfortable after that. I'm guessing this movement will take it, as after all, that's it's purpose?
That's brilliant, thanks a lot... put my mind at rest, just feels wrong how many manual winds it would take to get to 5 days!! Not worn it long enough to observe automatic winding. Thanks againBahnstormer_vRS wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2024 2:55 pm With an Automatic SH21 on the wrist, again from experience, from stopped one day's wear should charge to around 4 day's PR with a top up to 5 days the following morning.
Hope this helps.
Guy
PS> I rarely handwind an automatic watch beyond 5 - 10 winds that might be necessary to get it going.
Sent from my Galaxy S23 Ultra using Tapatalk
I gotta say that I too would feel your concern. From what I've picked up, initial problems typically have to do with the 'autowinding/power-reserve'. The good thing is that once the movement is sent in to fix an issue, the returned version is pretty much always reported to be working fine.Redpat wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 7:28 pm I'm starting to feel a little nervous about my first purchase today. I picked up the sh21 bmf by pure chance and instantly new I wanted it. Obviously, being limited numbers I did a quick internet search, skim read and hit the buy button. Now this evening after digesting today's actions, I delved a little close into the model and am starting to feel alarmed at the reported number of issues. I'm not an experienced watch wearer at all and this is my first ever significant purchase. Fingers crossed mine is up to the task and the QC issues have been ironed out.
Pat
The PR seems to be working well, wearing as a daily and it seems to be slightly less effective at self winding than it was when new, but still fine. I've not done any analytical measuring of PR Vs rate as I've had both jobs running flat out for the last few weeks, so play has had to take a back seat. I'll do some proper measurement on it now life has returned to normal pace.Bahnstormer_vRS wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 10:37 pm @Chris GB - that sounds promising.
So if the timekeeping, which will drift if the Power Reserve (PR) is <3 days is okay, how is the PR itself?
Powering up OK? Holding PR if consistently worn?
Guy
^^^This^^^Redpat wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 11:01 pm I'm glad it all seems to have levelled out and working pretty much as it should. I think I'm probably overthinking it. At the end of the day CW must have built a fair few thousand products utilising the sh21 and only a handful seem to have had any issues. I will cross my fingers and just try and enjoy my bmf. After all, there is a 5 year warranty and from what I've learned since joing the forum is that cws customer service is pretty good these days.
Thanks for the update
Pat