Discuss Christopher Ward watches
KevRC4130
Senior
Posts: 67 Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 7:11 pm
CW-watches: 0
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Post
by KevRC4130 » Mon Jan 02, 2006 6:28 am
Well? Personally, I hate having a watch that has anything to do with the word "cheap". I realise it is merely British wit, but I don't like to flaunt the fact that my watch costs less than most people think
Warhol
Senior
Posts: 114 Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:23 pm
CW-watches: 0
Location: Bodegraven, The Netherlands
Post
by Warhol » Mon Jan 02, 2006 7:13 am
Well, I think the slogan fits the watch, but the word cheap isn't really a word that i'd like to discribe the watch.
So drop the word cheap
Hans
Administrator Emeritus - Founder
Posts: 2266 Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:24 am
CW-watches: 7
LE-one: yes
LE-two: yes
Location: The Netherlands
Post
by Hans » Mon Jan 02, 2006 7:14 am
I have to agree with you on that one. Good poll!
Hey, anybody a suggestion for a better slogan? Maybe we can inspire Chris.
El Tiempo
Senior Guru
Posts: 785 Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 12:53 am
CW-watches: 0
Location: Parts Unknown
Post
by El Tiempo » Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:20 am
While I thought it was a little strange at first, I don't hate it.
Maybe it should be " the most inexpensive expensive watches in the world".
Cheaply,
El Tiempo.
joerattz
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 1281 Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:34 pm
CW-watches: 8
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Post
by joerattz » Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:54 pm
How about "the most affordable expensive watches in the world"?
KevRC4130
Senior
Posts: 67 Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 7:11 pm
CW-watches: 0
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Post
by KevRC4130 » Tue Jan 03, 2006 11:35 pm
joerattz wrote: How about "the most affordable expensive watches in the world"?
That's better, but I don't think the low price should be told in the slogan... I think many WIS are turned off by the low price. Let them admire, and THEN let them find out it's under $200
joerattz
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 1281 Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:34 pm
CW-watches: 8
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Post
by joerattz » Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:01 am
Yes, I was just reading one of the heated threads I think you innocently created at TZ.
Hans
Administrator Emeritus - Founder
Posts: 2266 Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:24 am
CW-watches: 7
LE-one: yes
LE-two: yes
Location: The Netherlands
Post
by Hans » Wed Jan 04, 2006 11:09 am
What about: "...the least expensive most expensive watches in the world..."??
Bob Demers
Newbie
Posts: 28 Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 8:24 pm
CW-watches: 0
Location: Massachusetts
Post
by Bob Demers » Fri Jan 13, 2006 3:22 am
..the "cheap" bothers me a bit as well. The Malvern is certainly cheap but not cheap!
..maybe something like: ..The Malvern; much more for much less!
Kind of corny but tells the tale.
Bob Demers
6 Replies
376 Views
Last post by iain Sat Jun 22, 2024 7:13 am
5 Replies
1056 Views
Last post by asqwerth Thu Apr 11, 2024 4:08 am