1st post and you insult the Americans and you think NOON watches are good. I bit and had a look at their web site. Horrid plastic multi-colour and horrendous. Even with the 50% sale I am not tempted. They make Swatch watches look classy.Passionflower wrote:This rebranding logo looks to be the work of an American...... cheap, tacky and tasteless. I have bought 7 watches from CW in the last two years or so but no more for me, particularly when you can pick up really innovative designs from NOON for around £100.00. I shall be sorry not to follow the latest develpoments in CW designs but the logo is just a no,no for me.
CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
- ianblyth
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 10940
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 10:17 pm
- CW-watches: 19
- LE-two: yes
- LE-three: yes
- LE-foura: yes
- LE-five: Yes
- LE-six: Yes
- Location: Wokingham, UK
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
"We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are." Anais Nin
- cblackburn
- Senior
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 8:47 pm
- CW-watches: 9
- LE-three: yes
- LE-foura: yes
- Location: Aberdeenshire, UK
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
Firstly, its considered polite to introduce yourself via the Member Introduction section before making posts in other areas.Passionflower wrote:This rebranding logo looks to be the work of an American...... cheap, tacky and tasteless. I have bought 7 watches from CW in the last two years or so but no more for me, particularly when you can pick up really innovative designs from NOON for around £100.00. I shall be sorry not to follow the latest develpoments in CW designs but the logo is just a no,no for me.
Second, you may not be aware but CW watches has a large following across the pond and this forum is frequented by a large number of Americans with exceptional taste and manners. Notably, the highly respected forum moderator is American!
Thirdly, I will refrain from the abusive response I originally typed about NOON watches and say that I do not think they are innovative or classy. I admit the price of CW watches is rising to some new levels but you cannot compare what they produce to the junk by NOON.
We are fortunate to live a world where free speech is a basic right and you are entitled to your opinion. I respectfully disagree, but simply say that you should consider your audience before offending them so badly!
Own:
W6 Kingfisher Splash Green
C9 JH #011
C5 Malvern Quartz #0038
C9 2011 FLE #060
C6 Kingfisher Pro Yellow
C20 Lido
C60 2012 FLE Blue #024
C1 Russell
C80 Sector
W6 Kingfisher Splash Green
C9 JH #011
C5 Malvern Quartz #0038
C9 2011 FLE #060
C6 Kingfisher Pro Yellow
C20 Lido
C60 2012 FLE Blue #024
C1 Russell
C80 Sector
-
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 2827
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 7:03 pm
- CW-watches: 8
- LE-one: yes
- LE-two: yes
- LE-three: yes
- Location: very south Hampshire
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
I agree. I found the generalised comments towards American's taste to be insulting and I don't think NOON watches are a very good example. I like one of the designs but would never buy it. There are other brands to compare but saying NOON are an alternative to CWL is insulting the brand more than changing the name to CHR.WARD
- village
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 5554
- Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:10 pm
- CW-watches: 4
- Location: any further South and my feet would be wet...
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
Passionflower wrote:This rebranding logo looks to be the work of an American...... cheap, tacky and tasteless. I have bought 7 watches from CW in the last two years or so but no more for me, particularly when you can pick up really innovative designs from NOON for around £100.00. I shall be sorry not to follow the latest develpoments in CW designs but the logo is just a no,no for me.
Seriously...NOON innovative? cheap looking,tacky looking and shipped over in containers.
I don't like the logo either but i don't think you can blame the US for this one
TBH,as a first post it's about as thought out as the Olympic ticket sales.
If you can read this you are too close to your computer screen....
-
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 2827
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 7:03 pm
- CW-watches: 8
- LE-one: yes
- LE-two: yes
- LE-three: yes
- Location: very south Hampshire
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
Take it you didn't get the tickets for the womens beach volley ball thenvillage wrote:
TBH,as a first post it's about as thought out as the Olympic ticket sales.
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
To me it looks like a sign you would see in the hospital. This way to the CHR Ward...
The name makes no sense, it isn't pronounceable so it isn't repeatable.
But the worst thing is, technically it is very poor - the C is bigger than the letters in WARD for some reason. In a business where attention to detail is absolute key - this is a horrible oversight.
The worst thing is - if they would have consulted their core customer base and obtained feedback during the concept stage - there wouldn't be such a backlash.
You will always divide opinion, but 80% disliking something is very very high.
The name makes no sense, it isn't pronounceable so it isn't repeatable.
But the worst thing is, technically it is very poor - the C is bigger than the letters in WARD for some reason. In a business where attention to detail is absolute key - this is a horrible oversight.
The worst thing is - if they would have consulted their core customer base and obtained feedback during the concept stage - there wouldn't be such a backlash.
You will always divide opinion, but 80% disliking something is very very high.
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
this argument does not stand up. To take an example from elsewhere, when The Labour Party was rebranded as 'New Labour' the move was vehemently disliked by the activists and long-standing supporters of the party (myself included). This did not prevent its being outstandingly successful amongst the wider population.
Of course New Labour is now discredited but this is more to do with the personalities and infighting that ensued in its latter days.
The point remains that sometimes the 'core' support is just too close to the issue to see the wider picture.
Of course New Labour is now discredited but this is more to do with the personalities and infighting that ensued in its latter days.
The point remains that sometimes the 'core' support is just too close to the issue to see the wider picture.
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
New Labour - outstandingly successful. WTF!highway62 wrote:this argument does not stand up. To take an example from elsewhere, when The Labour Party was rebranded as 'New Labour' the move was vehemently disliked by the activists and long-standing supporters of the party (myself included). This did not prevent its being outstandingly successful amongst the wider population.
Of course New Labour is now discredited but this is more to do with the personalities and infighting that ensued in its latter days.
The point remains that sometimes the 'core' support is just too close to the issue to see the wider picture.
I would hazard a guess that most of the time the phrase "New Labour" was mentioned, the context was either disparaging or an attempt at humour.
I think the majority of people saw it for exactly what it was - just a cynical marketing excercise that made no damn difference at all.
Do you seriously believe that the new name (New Labour) attracted new people to the party?
Richard
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
Very different - that was a name change and people didn't like the addition of thw word new.highway62 wrote:this argument does not stand up. To take an example from elsewhere, when The Labour Party was rebranded as 'New Labour' the move was vehemently disliked by the activists and long-standing supporters of the party (myself included). This did not prevent its being outstandingly successful amongst the wider population.
Of course New Labour is now discredited but this is more to do with the personalities and infighting that ensued in its latter days.
The point remains that sometimes the 'core' support is just too close to the issue to see the wider picture.
Also one was a political party, this is a watchmaker.
Most here seem dislike the visual change as much as anything and a general unbalanced feeling in the logo does not bode well for a watchmaker IMHO.
Very different scenarios.
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
FFS, of course it worked! New Labour was a purging of ideology and principles aimed purely and simply at gaining power. As a result Bambi won 3 elections in a row. Like it or loathe it (guess which camp I was in!! ), you cannot deny its success...
- jmarchitect
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 4420
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:00 pm
- CW-watches: 3
- Location: sunny south coast, UK
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
Just caught this post. To be honest I have tried to stay away from this section as I am becoming somewhat bored with the negative comments about the rebrand. I wanted to say- it has happened, we have all had our say (I like it) lets move on and get onto to talking about watch movements or filling our cases with special gel or something but I couldn't be bothered.... oh hang on, I have just said it.ianblyth wrote:1st post and you insult the Americans and you think NOON watches are good. I bit and had a look at their web site. Horrid plastic multi-colour and horrendous. Even with the 50% sale I am not tempted. They make Swatch watches look classy.Passionflower wrote:This rebranding logo looks to be the work of an American...... cheap, tacky and tasteless. I have bought 7 watches from CW in the last two years or so but no more for me, particularly when you can pick up really innovative designs from NOON for around £100.00. I shall be sorry not to follow the latest develpoments in CW designs but the logo is just a no,no for me.
Anyhoo- what nonsense is Passionflower spouting? Why would anyone decide to make a cheap, tacky and tasteless statement like that? Noon watches? Absolute bol**cks. I would rather ingest metal shavings through my tear ducts than look at one of those pieces of trash.
Might have a point about our American cousins though
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
And you claim all that happened because of the new name... you poor deluded fool. All Sir Tony had to do was appeal to the dissaffected Tory vote... achieved by policy and rhetoric, not via a name change. Ye Gods.highway62 wrote:FFS, of course it worked! New Labour was a purging of ideology and principles aimed purely and simply at gaining power. As a result Bambi won 3 elections in a row. Like it or loathe it (guess which camp I was in!! ), you cannot deny its success...
Richard
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
As a designer myself I would personally have suggested something more balanced - I think balance and harmony is one of the main keys to be portrayed in any logo but especially in a company that crafts instruments of precision - everything should be balanced and lined up PERFECTLY which at the moment it isn't.
They could retain the typeface as that works well - but - drop the HR. We could marry the C to the W to give a nice relationship and make the logo more than just being a font anyone can recreate in Word.
This would actually shorten it even further which was the main drive behind the change it seems..
Something like this
By joining the CW you would also be able to shorten the logo to be a monogram - this would negate the need to have 2 logos:
They could retain the typeface as that works well - but - drop the HR. We could marry the C to the W to give a nice relationship and make the logo more than just being a font anyone can recreate in Word.
This would actually shorten it even further which was the main drive behind the change it seems..
Something like this
By joining the CW you would also be able to shorten the logo to be a monogram - this would negate the need to have 2 logos:
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
Oh don't be so dumb! The whole point of the label 'New Labour' was to facilitate that very appeal. The supporters of both main parties find it extremely difficult to transfer to the other (hence why most elections are decided by a tiny number of true swing voters) by rebranding The Labour Party as a 'New' party the movement of the Tory vote ('Mondeo man' anyone?) was made far easier.
Re: CWL/Chr.Ward rebranding poll
as a potential purchaser of my first CW, a missing 'London' would be a significant disincentive...
Tim
Tim
------------------
JLC Diving GMT
JLC Diving GMT
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 216 Views
-
Last post by Kip
-
- 45 Replies
- 1332 Views
-
Last post by Amor Vincit Omnia
-
- 9 Replies
- 494 Views
-
Last post by missF
-
- 12 Replies
- 436 Views
-
Last post by Bahnstormer_vRS
-
- 5 Replies
- 432 Views
-
Last post by Tonywalker