Discuss Christopher Ward watches
TheBeatles
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 2691 Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 8:36 am
CW-watches: 0
Location: Newcastle, UK
Post
by TheBeatles » Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:31 pm
albionphoto wrote: ↑ Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:23 pm
Seiko won 66% to 34%. Oh well. It's hard to beat the Seiko fandom
You make it sound as if the only way they won was because of fandom, and that Seiko wouldn’t have won without outside help.
Even tho a dedicated forum was asked to help out. A tad ironic in my view.
Basically, I'm for anything that gets you through the night. Be it prayer, tranquilizers or a bottle of Jack Daniels, Frank Sinatra
All You Need Is Love, The Beatles
Too much of anything is bad. But too much of good whiskey is barely enough, Mark Twain
albionphoto
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 2596 Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:07 pm
CW-watches: 10
Location: New Jersey
Post
by albionphoto » Fri Sep 22, 2023 11:43 am
TheBeatles wrote: ↑ Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:31 pm
albionphoto wrote: ↑ Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:23 pm
Seiko won 66% to 34%. Oh well. It's hard to beat the Seiko fandom
You make it sound as if the only way they won was because of fandom, and that Seiko wouldn’t have won without outside help.
Even tho a dedicated forum was asked to help out. A tad ironic in my view.
I'm not a fan of either watch, there are a lot more fans of Seiko than CW and this forum is tiny. My irony was implicit, yours was not.
Mark
Bremont, Casio, Citizen, Christopher Ward, Chronotechna, Formex, Mido, Omega and Oris
TheBeatles
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 2691 Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 8:36 am
CW-watches: 0
Location: Newcastle, UK
Post
by TheBeatles » Fri Sep 22, 2023 1:00 pm
albionphoto wrote: ↑ Fri Sep 22, 2023 11:43 am
TheBeatles wrote: ↑ Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:31 pm
albionphoto wrote: ↑ Thu Sep 21, 2023 4:23 pm
Seiko won 66% to 34%. Oh well. It's hard to beat the Seiko fandom
You make it sound as if the only way they won was because of fandom, and that Seiko wouldn’t have won without outside help.
Even tho a dedicated forum was asked to help out. A tad ironic in my view.
I'm not a fan of either watch, there are a lot more fans of Seiko than CW and this forum is tiny. My irony was implicit, yours was not.
Don’t quite see it that way!!
You mentioned fandom.
Basically, I'm for anything that gets you through the night. Be it prayer, tranquilizers or a bottle of Jack Daniels, Frank Sinatra
All You Need Is Love, The Beatles
Too much of anything is bad. But too much of good whiskey is barely enough, Mark Twain
albionphoto
Senior Forumgod
Posts: 2596 Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:07 pm
CW-watches: 10
Location: New Jersey
Post
by albionphoto » Fri Sep 22, 2023 10:59 pm
Of course you don't.
Mark
Bremont, Casio, Citizen, Christopher Ward, Chronotechna, Formex, Mido, Omega and Oris
NigelS
Expert
Posts: 202 Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2023 8:02 am
CW-watches: 2
Location: Stone, Staffs, UK
Post
by NigelS » Sat Sep 30, 2023 12:51 pm
StrappedUp wrote: ↑ Thu Sep 21, 2023 11:06 am
Coming from someone who currently has the Dune GMT, has handled a few Alpinists and also owns a Seiko Laurel Alpinist re-interpretation, I can say hand on heart that the Seiko is nowhere near the watch that the Dune is.
I'm a big Seiko fan as well as CW . . . . the Seiko is a decent watch at its price point, but I'd say the Dune is a fantastic watch at RRP.
. . . . and so say all of us. These surveys are for armchair Generals and for those who as small boys played highest up the wall . . . and probably still do looking at the comments section on the Fratello site. For what its worth I have a 36mm (standard grade Sellita movement) and a Baby Alpinist with the same 6R35 as the 'compass bezel' Alpinist. The Sealander timegraph report reads -3.5 secs/day and the Seiko -16. They both cost the same but the Seiko is heading for the door as I am so disappointed with it, to be replaced with another CWL.
.
CW C63 Sealander 36 v Seiko Baby Alpinist
'Life is Art, and not otherwise' C.S.Lewis
8 Replies
357 Views
Last post by Greatpotfarm Fri Jun 13, 2025 1:09 am
0 Replies
340 Views
Last post by RichM Mon May 26, 2025 8:46 pm