As per title, aside from the CW logo update are there any other aesthetic internal/external differences between the old or current C9 Harrison prices at £375 and the 'new' version which is £390?just curious if there are any other changes that were made to the newer version to warrant the price increase or do they look identical?
Ive never looked twice at the C9 Harrison before because the 43mm size and lug-to-lug length put me off due to my 6.5-6.75 inch wrists. However the silver/white face version looks so classy that Im now seriously considering going against my instinct...would make a great daily watch for work
C9 Harrison - old and new version differences?
-
- Senior Expert
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:07 am
C9 Harrison - old and new version differences?
Citizen,Tag Heuer,Oris,Victorinox Swiss Army,Casio,G-Shock,Fossil, Guess
- Kip
- The Administrator
- Posts: 35171
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:45 pm
- CW-watches: 150
- LE-one: yes
- LE-two: yes
- LE-three: yes
- LE-foura: yes
- LE-fourb: yes
- LE-five: yes
- LE-six: yes
- LESeven: yes
- Location: New Hampshire, USA
Re: C9 Harrison - old and new version differences?
The difference is that the new C9SGW has a slightly more costly Optic white dial with gold numerals and hands.
Kip
"Asylum Administrator"
Visit the CWArchives for everything CW. Historical, specs, manuals and resale. It is all there.
"Asylum Administrator"
Visit the CWArchives for everything CW. Historical, specs, manuals and resale. It is all there.
- ianblyth
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 10940
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 10:17 pm
- CW-watches: 19
- LE-two: yes
- LE-three: yes
- LE-foura: yes
- LE-five: Yes
- LE-six: Yes
- Location: Wokingham, UK
Re: C9 Harrison - old and new version differences?
For smaller wrists the C5 is a much better dress watch.
"We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are." Anais Nin
- welshlad
- Moderator
- Posts: 11300
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:33 am
- CW-watches: 27
- Location: Yorkshire, UK
Re: C9 Harrison - old and new version differences?
I have the same size wrist as you and I had the new white-gold version when it first came out. However, despite it being a beautiful watch, I came to the conclusion that it was just too big and exchanged it for a C10 under the 360 scheme, which I'm much happier with so far.watchlover1 wrote:Ive never looked twice at the C9 Harrison before because the 43mm size and lug-to-lug length put me off due to my 6.5-6.75 inch wrists. However the silver/white face version looks so classy that Im now seriously considering going against my instinct...would make a great daily watch for work
Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future. - Niels Bohr
-
- Senior Expert
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:07 am
Re: C9 Harrison - old and new version differences?
thanks for info guys....as I thought the C9 will be too big for me to feel comfy wearing it. Ive owned a C5 previously but just didnt click with me...Im also not fond of any strap with a width of less than 20mm with 22mm being my preferred size...the 18mm on the C5 makes it feel too 'skinny'.
Citizen,Tag Heuer,Oris,Victorinox Swiss Army,Casio,G-Shock,Fossil, Guess
Re: C9 Harrison - old and new version differences?
Check out the 39mm Archimede that pcal referenced in another thread:
http://www.christopherwardforum.com/vie ... =1&t=14735
http://www.christopherwardforum.com/vie ... =1&t=14735
- ianblyth
- Senior Forumgod
- Posts: 10940
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 10:17 pm
- CW-watches: 19
- LE-two: yes
- LE-three: yes
- LE-foura: yes
- LE-five: Yes
- LE-six: Yes
- Location: Wokingham, UK
Re: C9 Harrison - old and new version differences?
So you want a 38mm watch with a 22mm strap?watchlover1 wrote:thanks for info guys....as I thought the C9 will be too big for me to feel comfy wearing it. Ive owned a C5 previously but just didnt click with me...Im also not fond of any strap with a width of less than 20mm with 22mm being my preferred size...the 18mm on the C5 makes it feel too 'skinny'.
"We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are." Anais Nin
-
- Senior Expert
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:07 am
Re: C9 Harrison - old and new version differences?
38-41mm range would be fineianblyth wrote:So you want a 38mm watch with a 22mm strap?watchlover1 wrote:thanks for info guys....as I thought the C9 will be too big for me to feel comfy wearing it. Ive owned a C5 previously but just didnt click with me...Im also not fond of any strap with a width of less than 20mm with 22mm being my preferred size...the 18mm on the C5 makes it feel too 'skinny'.
Citizen,Tag Heuer,Oris,Victorinox Swiss Army,Casio,G-Shock,Fossil, Guess
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post