Masonic101 wrote:..who owns this forum, that if you should dare say anything negative about the brand, or especially, disagree with an attention seeking Alpha male/Mod, you'll be chastised. And for the 'safety' of the other forum members, you'll be banned.
My hat goes off to Tyke for his honesty and, so far, avoiding being banned.
Adios
Interesting point, how have I avoided being banned?
Not that I wish to associate myself with this or any other incarnation of the OP.
scooter wrote:......because there is a huge difference between a strong minded Individual not afraid to say what he thinks and a Troll, trolling for the sake of it.
We go back a long way, have certainly had a few spats but I respect you and your opinions.
Seemed a fairly reasonable bloke until this thread.
Can I ask what the original beef / reason for banning him was as I see he's been banned numerous times but was an active member for the first year or two?
Seems to be carrying a grudge or two. A lot of effort to go to posting 60 reasonable posts just to then go on a rant.
Lego wrote:Is this Masonic bloke Martin? I'm guessing it is.
He's constantly on FB criticising CW..
Yes it is. Quite sad, really.
Don't really want to get involved in all this shenanigans....
However, have the forum rules & etiquette (5; 12; ...) been breached here?
Also, is it right to give a persons real name?
Anyway, suggest this whole thread it deleted and lets move on.
What I don't really get is why he didn't stay on and contribute in a friendly manor as he does on facebook, I don't really know the history behind previous threads and what his beef is with this forum but If he enjoys CW watches why not keep this account going instead of getting banned and then coming back on building up your posts, to me it just seems a waste of time.